Hello, Dear list,
I am more and more glad with our list; instead of fumbling and trying out as
I used to be, I just ask ^_^
A small question again..
How do you just pizz a few measures, then return to arco, in midi?
thanks very much
Neuro
___
Why not try the obvious solution:
\score{
\relative c'{
\set Staff.midiInstrument = "violin"
c d e f
\set Staff.midiInstrument = "pizzicato strings"
c d e f
\set Staff.midiInstrument = "violin"
c d e f
}
\midi{}
}
/Mats
Neuro wrote:
Hello, Dear list,
I am more and more glad with our l
Yes ~ , It works ^_^
Thank you Mats, very much :)
Neuro
- Original Message -
From: "Mats Bengtsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Neuro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 1:01 AM
Subject: Re: pizz and arco in midi
Why not try the obvious solution:
\score{
\relat
> Why not try the obvious solution:
> \score{
> \relative c'{
> \set Staff.midiInstrument = "violin"
> c d e f
> \set Staff.midiInstrument = "pizzicato strings"
> c d e f
> \set Staff.midiInstrument = "violin"
> c d e f
> }
> \midi{}
> }
BTW, there is a buglet in lilypond currently: \
hi list !
I'm sorry I haven't found a good trick for your pb, but when I put :
c4 \afterGrace d4 \override Voice.Stem #'length = #50.0
{ c16[ d] }
the grace aspect changes.
Actually, I'm not an expert in override, so...
I'll try something else today
JMarc
___
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 10:58, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
> > ... hmm, what about allowing
> > \tuplet 3:2 {c8 d e} \tuplet { f e d}
>
> Again, I definitely vote against! We already now have too many
> optional constructs in the syntax, which causes more confusion than
> i
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 07:51, Graham Percival wrote:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > Jonathan Henkelman escreveu:
> >> I think Eriks point is actually well founded. The discussion started
> >> with my discussion of trying to trim down the grammer complexity. Adding
> >> syntax is not really i
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 15:25, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> >>> \tuplet 3:2 {...}
> >>
> >> One minor detail is that the name isn't exactly appropriate when you
> >> do
> >> \set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 4)
> >> \times 2/3 {c8 d e f e d e f g f e d }
> >
>
Erik Sandberg wrote:
What about:
\tuplets 2/3 {c8 d e f e d e f g f e d }
We could also make \tuplet and \tuplets differ on the iterator level, so that
the tupletSpannerDuration property affects \tuplets expressions but not
\tuplet expressions.
I think that may just cause more confusio
Erik Sandberg escreveu:
> BTW, in this case it may be good to register the fraction as its own argument
> type, so \tuplets and \tuplet are generic music functions, both with
> signature
> (tuplet-fraction? music?)
it would be cool if we could pull this off, that would make \time generic too.
-
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
BTW, in this case it may be good to register the fraction as its own
argument type, so \tuplets and \tuplet are generic music functions,
both with signature
(tuplet-fraction? music?)
Maybe such an argument type can also be used in functions like
\compressMusic and
You didn't really say what kind of alignment you want. Also, it is good
habit to cut down the example files to only illustrate the specific problem
you are asking about. However, here is an example that gives (at least
almost)
centered alignment. If you want left alignment, just replace #CENTER
Paul Scott:
> Karl Hammar wrote:
...
> > I support Eriks idea:
> > . it is much easier to write 2 3 instead of 2/3
> >
> much?? It's about the same on my keyboard. 2/3 is even easier with the
> numeric keypad.
Well, it depends on which keyboard layout you are using.
The swedish one is like
On Thursday 21 December 2006 12:55, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Erik Sandberg escreveu:
> > BTW, in this case it may be good to register the fraction as its own
> > argument type, so \tuplets and \tuplet are generic music functions, both
> > with signature
> > (tuplet-fraction? music?)
>
> it would b
Hi everybody,
a while ago I thought i might put my own bit into the lilypond work. So
I checked the stuff on the development pages and ended up that a German
translation for the web page and the documentation would be a nice
thing. But first I thought of asking here if there is this kind of
p
how can I make no cautionary clefs?
I tried without success:
\override Staff.Clef #'transparent = ##t
and
\set Staff.forceClef = ##f
thanks..
--
Mehmet Okonsar,
pianist-composer-conductor
www.okonsar.com
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@
Erik Sandberg escreveu:
> On Thursday 21 December 2006 12:55, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>> Erik Sandberg escreveu:
>>> BTW, in this case it may be good to register the fraction as its own
>>> argument type, so \tuplets and \tuplet are generic music functions, both
>>> with signature
>>> (tuplet-fract
I was interested in construct/processing rhythms with lisp or python, like
we could do
in open music with "tree" library, and output for Lillypond.
OM uses the Comom Music Notation, that is very good for this kind of task.
It looks like this:
(cmn treble (rqq '(2 ((1 (1 1 1 2)) (1 (1 2)) (1 (1 2
Stephen Kress wrote:
> 4. By default, a single number will be engraved in the tuplet bracket.
There is already the text property of the TupletNumber object that can be
tweaked to get the ratio printed if one so desires. In other words, no
changes need to be made to LP in how the single numbe
You mean the small clef at the end of the line if the clef change
happens at a
line break, right? Try
\set Staff.explicitClefVisibility = #end-of-line-invisible
/Mats
Mehmet Okonsar wrote:
how can I make no cautionary clefs?
I tried without success:
\override Staff.Clef #'transparent = ##
Jonathan Henkelman wrote:
How exactly will this work. \times 2/3 {c8 d e f g a} does not produce the
output _I_ would expect, which is two standard triplets. Instead it produces
two triplets with a single spanner with the text '3' in it. Do we want to
work on this default notation at the
On Thursday 21 December 2006 15:01, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Erik Sandberg escreveu:
> > On Thursday 21 December 2006 12:55, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> >> Erik Sandberg escreveu:
> >>> BTW, in this case it may be good to register the fraction as its own
> >>> argument type, so \tuplets and \tuplet
Frédéric Chiasson wrote:
> But to avoid repeating \tuplet functions for long passages with the
> same tuplets, we could admit that kind of syntax :
>
> \tuplet 3:2 {c8 d e f g a b c d e d c b a g f e d}
>
> without having one long bracket going through all the notes. But I
> understand that you d
Till Rettig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Till,
> a while ago I thought i might put my own bit into the lilypond
> work. So I checked the stuff on the development pages and ended up
> that a German translation for the web page and the documentation would
> be a nice thing. But first I thought of
On Thursday 21 December 2006 16:11, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> \set Staff.explicitClefVisibility = #end-of-line-invisible
ok thank you
--
Mehmet Okonsar,
pianist-composer-conductor
www.okonsar.com
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http:
I'm moving this to lilypond-user, since it no longer has anything to
do with the particular bug that started the thread.
> "Graham" == Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Graham> Laura Conrad wrote:
>>> "Graham" == Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
G
Hi there,
I am working on a guitar chord library for lily [1] based on the
\fret-diagram command.
The generator is written in python.
The chord configuration file is quite simple:
a section header indicates the chord type. Followin lines a defining a
chord name. If a chord name ends with "-b" t
I hope you have read the NEWS included in the on-line documentation for
version 2.10, especially about the FretBoards context.
/Mats
Sébastien Gross wrote:
Hi there,
I am working on a guitar chord library for lily [1] based on the
\fret-diagram command.
The generator is written in python.
Mats Bengtsson ee.kth.se> writes:
> Jonathan Henkelman wrote:
> >
> > How exactly will this work. \times 2/3 {c8 d e f g a} does not produce
the
> > output _I_ would expect, which is two standard triplets. Instead it
produces
> > two triplets with a single spanner with the text '3' in it.
Yes, that makes sense.
Frédéric
2006/12/21, John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Frédéric Chiasson wrote:
> But to avoid repeating \tuplet functions for long passages with the
> same tuplets, we could admit that kind of syntax :
>
> \tuplet 3:2 {c8 d e f g a b c d e d c b a g f e d}
>
> withou
Am Donnerstag, 21. Dezember 2006 14:05 schrieb Till Rettig:
> Another point is the support for ancient notation, especially the
> mensural or renaissance engravers. I think there should still be some
> work done, and I would be happy if I could also help here -- though I
> don't know will I actuall
On 12/21/06, bbarros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was interested in construct/processing rhythms with lisp or python, like
we could do
in open music with "tree" library, and output for Lillypond.
OM uses the Comom Music Notation, that is very good for this kind of task.
It looks like this:
(cm
On 12/20/06, Kress, Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok. Based on what everyone has been saying and seeming to come to an
agreement on, here's the details of the changes that we are proposing be
made.
1. \times is replaced by \tuplet since tuplet makes more musical sense and
convert-ly
seb-g wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> I am working on a guitar chord library for lily [1] based on the
> \fret-diagram command.
>
> The generator is written in python.
>
> The chord configuration file is quite simple:
>
> --
> Sebastien Gross
>
>
> __
Rick Hansen (aka RickH) wrote:
>
>
>
> seb-g wrote:
>>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I am working on a guitar chord library for lily [1] based on the
>> \fret-diagram command.
>>
>> The generator is written in python.
>>
>> The chord configuration file is quite simple:
>>
>> --
>> Sebastien Gross
Hi,
What's the right way to typeset doublequotes in markup? The expression ...
\markup { The word "andante" should appear between quotes. }
... doesn't do what I would imagine.
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypo
What's the right way to typeset doublequotes in markup? The expression ...
\markup { The word "andante" should appear between quotes. }
I guess it wouldn't. Can you use the character code instead? Or set
real left and right double-quotes, which LilyPond doesn't use for
anything else?
Geoff
I have enclosed two messages which I think are getting at the same problem in
different ways. Regardless of \tuplet vs. \times and the associated programming
discussion, I think the fact that Lily's default is to print nonsense in this
kind of case, should be thought of as a bug.
Jonathan Henk
how to temporarily "ungroup" a staff, i.e. remove it from the group it belongs
so barlines are not connected..
thanks
--
Mehmet Okonsar,
pianist-composer-conductor
www.okonsar.com
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.
Popular question nowadays. See "Entering Lyrics" in the manual.
/Mats
Trevor Bača wrote:
Hi,
What's the right way to typeset doublequotes in markup? The expression
...
\markup { The word "andante" should appear between quotes. }
... doesn't do what I would imagine.
--
That's a tricky question. I don't see any obvious solution.
/Mats
Mehmet Okonsar wrote:
how to temporarily "ungroup" a staff, i.e. remove it from the group it belongs
so barlines are not connected..
thanks
--
=
Mats Bengtsson
How can I change the "current" duration in my music without actually entering
something that will take up any beats? IOW we all know that duration is
"sticky", it remains at whatever you last set it to so that you do not have
to continually type in duration numbers. What command can I enter to "
I just learned to input them so:
\score {
{ c' d' e' f' }
\header {
piece = "Branle \"Quatre Branles\""
opus = "Susato"
}
}
for a title. Maybe you can use it for your purposes.
Manuel
Am 21/12/2006 um 18:17 schrieb Trevor Bača:
Hi,
What's the right way to typeset doublequo
seb-g wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> I am working on a guitar chord library for lily [1] based on the
> \fret-diagram command.
>
> The generator is written in python.
>
> --
> Sebastien Gross
>
>
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.
The problem is that the approach won't work, since
when you do
\myVariable = { a }
the note will get a duration already when you do the
variable assignment, taken from the previous duration
used in the file. In general, the "sticky" durations are
handled directly when the file is parsed, so the
Laura Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think this might be worth discussing on the users' list. The
> contributors are probably all making some assumptions about people's
> work habits that doubtless hold true for only some of the population.
> So here's the question: What are your actual a
"Trevor Bača" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> What's the right way to typeset doublequotes in markup? The expression ...
>
> \markup { The word "andante" should appear between quotes. }
>
>
> ... doesn't do what I would imagine.
\markup { The word "\"andante\"" \italic does appear between
Would it be possible to change the stencil of a grace note so that it appears
invisible and of zero width? Then enter the grace note with the desired
"current" duration? It is my understanding that grace notes dont count
against my beats but they do appear to reset the current sticky duration, i
John Mandereau wrote:
Frédéric Chiasson wrote:
But to avoid repeating \tuplet functions for long passages with the
same tuplets, we could admit that kind of syntax :
\tuplet 3:2 {c8 d e f g a b c d e d c b a g f e d}
without having one long bracket going through all the notes. But I
under
Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
The conversion from 1.6 or 1.8 to 2.2 was painful, because of the many
syntax changes there were then (\markup, or << >> vs < > for instance),
The conversion rules in convert-ly to handle the changes
around 1.9.0 have been revised some year ago and should
handle the co
Citando Eduardo Vieira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello list, I'm still puzzled with this problem. Can anybody help me?
> We know that in some words an hyphen should be used and as part of lyrics of
> a
> song it must not disappear.
> I'm trying to do that based on a suggestion of an older version of t
hello list,
i can't compile either 2.10.2 or 2.10.3 on my gentoo linux (everything
went fine with 2.8.8). the problem is that configure doesn't detect
correctly the versions of guile and mftrace. configure stops thus:
ERROR: Please install required programs: guile-config >= 1.6.7
(installed: 1.
luis jure wrote:
hello list,
i can't compile either 2.10.2 or 2.10.3 on my gentoo linux (everything
went fine with 2.8.8). the problem is that configure doesn't detect
correctly the versions of guile and mftrace. configure stops thus:
ERROR: Please install required programs: guile-config >= 1.
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 09:05:20AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yes, as Mats said please check out the FretBoards context, I sponsored it!
>
> It will allow you to transpose fret diagrams and enter fret diagrams using
> standard lilypond notes, it will auto detect the strings for minimal hand
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 12:45:52PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Here is an example of my "non-programmers" approach to forming a chord
> library: (note this example can only be run in version 2.11.4 or better due
> to a crash issue)
Ok I will install 2.11.4. I am still old fashion with 2.1
seb-g wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 09:05:20AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Yes, as Mats said please check out the FretBoards context, I sponsored
>> it!
>>
>> It will allow you to transpose fret diagrams and enter fret diagrams
>> using
>> standard lilypond notes, it will auto de
seb-g wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 12:45:52PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> Here is an example of my "non-programmers" approach to forming a chord
>> library: (note this example can only be run in version 2.11.4 or better
>> due
>> to a crash issue)
>
> Ok I will install 2.11.
The simple substitution example below should be pretty easy, but I'm "in a
pickle", can someone show me how to replace the note name in the transpose
statement with the note specified on the function call (parameter called
"root")?
But it gets the following error:
:2:13: error: syntax error, une
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 03:05:25PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> A define-music-function would be better than tags, then the whole library
> would be inside a function where you just specify the chord name as a string
> parameter then have a giant IF statement to generate the named chord, (root
seb-g wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 03:05:25PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> A define-music-function would be better than tags, then the whole library
>> would be inside a function where you just specify the chord name as a
>> string
>> parameter then have a giant IF statement to ge
Hello,
I tried for the first time to use parenthesises on notes but it doesn't
work. Am I doing something wrong?
\version "2.11.3"
\relative c'{
\parenthesize b1
}
Frédéric
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mai
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 03:41:19PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Yes, I was thinking \varMyChordLibrary would not be needed in this case, all
> the chords would simply come out of the function each embraced by an IF
> statement to match the input parameter (like a giant CASE selection).
> B
Citando Laura Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > "Eduardo" == Eduardo Vieira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> %% I don't want the hyphen "ti" and "frut" to disappear. The others
> can
> >> disappear.
>
> Why not just:
>
> text = \lyricmode {
> Tut -- ti- -- frut -- ti
> }
>
Be
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 12:45:52PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Here is an example of my "non-programmers" approach to forming a chord
> library: (note this example can only be run in version 2.11.4 or better due
> to a crash issue)
With this solution, fingering and notation will cause a prob
>> how can I make no cautionary clefs?
> You mean the small clef at the end of the line if the clef change
> happens at a line break, right? Try
>
> \set Staff.explicitClefVisibility = #end-of-line-invisible
Well, for no cautionary time signatures (at the end of a line) I've used
\override Scor
can we make the barline running between and connecting the staves disappear?
can we also make the "left barline" transparent at the start of systems?
On Thursday 21 December 2006 22:27, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> That's a tricky question. I don't see any obvious solution.
>
> /Mats
>
> Mehmet Okons
> . . . either you still need to have \set tupletSpannerDuration
> or you need to build the tuplet duration into the tuplet function
> itself, e.g. \tuplet 3:2 2. {c c8 c c4} for John's first example,
> and \tuplet 3:2 4. {c4 c8 c c4} for the second. . .
Yes. Up until this point, the argument ha
For ChordNames, to eliminate all the "add" whatevers, I use an exceptions
list which is documented, or search the archive for "jazzychord". I've had
my exceptions list for some time now and just use it routinely, there are
also cases where I'll call a chord a 6th vs a 13th, a sus4th an 11th, a su
68 matches
Mail list logo
