Hi Mats, list,
Mats wrote:
> However, from my experience as a choir singer, would definitely
> recommend you to typeset all the verses directly in the score.
> Unless it's a trivial tune that you can learn i 2 minutes, you
> have to jump back and forth between the music and the lyrics if
> it's ty
Christ Van Willegen wrote:
> Mats wrote:
> > However, from my experience as a choir singer, would definitely
> > recommend you to typeset all the verses directly in the score.
> > Unless it's a trivial tune that you can learn i 2 minutes, you have
> > to jump back and forth between the music and t
> "RI" == Ruth Ivimey-Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RI> Having throught some more about it, I don't think there is an
RI> optimal solution. Mats' solution (all verses with score) is
RI> fine for 1 or 2 verses, adequate for 3 and hopeless for 5 and
RI> more IMO; the reason i
On Friday 04 March 2005 18.05, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> I would recommend latex-book. A simple example could look somewhat like:
> \documentclass[a4paper]{article}
> \begin{document}
>
> \lilypondfile{myfile.ly}
>
> \begin{enumerate}
>% Use the automatic numbering, but start after verse 2:
>
Suddenly point-and-click is half working. With emacs open and Firefox
running, clicking on a note/rest in xpdf takes me to the line in the
*.ly file, but not the column.
I'm on a Fedora Core 3 system. Emacs is v21.3.1.
Ideas?
-David
___
lilypond-u
Mac OS 10.3.8, Lilypond 2.5.15 (thanks to Matthias Neracher)
I have noticed a dramatic increase in the time to process a lilypond
file compared to 2.5.13. A piano piece of 193 measures takes just short
of 9 minutes to process (lilypond blitz.ly) on a 1 GHz G4 iMac with no
other apps running.
Th
On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 13:04 -0600, Stan Sanderson wrote:
> Mac OS 10.3.8, Lilypond 2.5.15 (thanks to Matthias Neracher)
>
> I have noticed a dramatic increase in the time to process a lilypond
> file compared to 2.5.13. A piano piece of 193 measures takes just short
> of 9 minutes to process (li
I mentioned some strange printing behavior the other day. I just ran
some tests and have this to offer:
I'm using a freshly compiled v2.5.15 (ChangeLog 1.3285).
The output file is a single page of music.
Printing from ggv (Fedora Core 3 / Gnome) I get a page with just:
IB
...in the upper left
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Mac OS 10.3.8, Lilypond 2.5.15 (thanks to Matthias Neracher)
>
> I have noticed a dramatic increase in the time to process a lilypond
> file compared to 2.5.13. A piano piece of 193 measures takes just short
> of 9 minutes to process (lilypond blitz.ly) on a 1 GHz G4
On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 17:18:29 -0800, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9-Mar-05, at 4:39 PM, Matthew Peltzer wrote:
>
> > I'm fairly certain I've seen this in the user docs or on this list,
> > but I can't seem to find out how to temporialy disable lilypond from
> > rendering a secti
I'm still toying with point-and-click.
Here is my procedure:
Go to a directory with a PDF generated by LilyPond.
Open the PDF with Xpdf.
Start Firefox.
Start emacs with 'emacs&'.
Point and click in the PDF.
Emacs opens the file with the definitions and places a hollow cursor in
the proper li
Hi,
I am completely new to this. I just can't wait to put my own little tunes
in that really nice printed output. But I have no idea how to go on. I have
downloaded lily 2.4.2 for Windows (I run W98SE) and installed it. And there
I received the first glove from my system: something was missing, do
12 matches
Mail list logo
