Hi!
I never thought of switching off point and click till now but thats the way.
Thanks!
Francois
Am Montag, 23. März 2009 18:45 schrieb -Eluze:
> Francisco Vila-5 wrote:
> > /URI(textedit://path-to-your-lilypond-file.ly:1:2:2)>>
>
> and this path will never be found on the machine/server where
Francisco Vila-5 wrote:
>
> /URI(textedit://path-to-your-lilypond-file.ly:1:2:2)>>
>
and this path will never be found on the machine/server where the webpage
resides...
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/very-big-pdf-ps-tp22660584p22664609.html
Se
2009/3/23 -Eluze :
>
>
> with version 2.12 i got 1.00 MB with point-and-click against 147 KB without!
This is a ratio of 6.8 in this case. The 'with' version has
rectangular annotations for every single clickable object in the form
<>
/Subtype/Link>>endobj
14 0 obj
This is many chars added for e
with version 2.12 i got 1.00 MB with point-and-click against 147 KB without!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/very-big-pdf-ps-tp22660584p22661539.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Point and click is on by default. I saw no switching off of point and
click. This would greatly reduce the size of the PDF.
-David
Francois Planiol wrote:
Hi dear lilyponders,
I set a piece for organ (see source here); the admin of the webpage where the
piece is published asked if its poss
Hi dear lilyponders,
I set a piece for organ (see source here); the admin of the webpage where the
piece is published asked if its possible to reduce the size of the output. I
dont understand why this one is so big.
I still use 2.11.41 on Suse Linux 10.1
Thanks in advance and best greetings
F
