Le 19/05/2022 à 05:53, Ahanu Banerjee a écrit :
Hello,
When I have a beamed tuplet (without a bracket) and a fingering on one
note, the TupletNumber moves outward from the staff despite there
being no possibility of a collison. In normal usage,
TupletNumber should stay as close as possible to
uot;
>
> \relative c
>
> {\tuplet 3/2 { g''8_4 g g } \tuplet 3/2 { c^4 c c } }
>
>
>
> Mark
>
>
>
> *From:* lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=
> ca.rr@gnu.org] *On Behalf Of *Ahanu Banerjee
> *Sent:* Wednesday, M
:54 PM
To: Lily Pond
Subject: TupletNumber placement with fingering
Hello,
When I have a beamed tuplet (without a bracket) and a fingering on one note,
the TupletNumber moves outward from the staff despite there being no
possibility of a collison. In normal usage, TupletNumber should stay a
Hello,
When I have a beamed tuplet (without a bracket) and a fingering on one
note, the TupletNumber moves outward from the staff despite there being no
possibility of a collison. In normal usage, TupletNumber should stay as
close as possible to the beam.
Example:
\version "2.22.2"
\relative c
{
Yes, that works perfectly. Thank you!
On 20 November 2012 12:08, Thomas Morley wrote:
> 2012/11/20 Gagi Petrovic :
> > Dear Ponders, i can't find how to change the placement of the
> tupletNumber
> > so that the text "sim." is placed under the "6" of my tuplet. See
> > attachment.
> >
> > When us
2012/11/20 Gagi Petrovic :
> Dear Ponders, i can't find how to change the placement of the tupletNumber
> so that the text "sim." is placed under the "6" of my tuplet. See
> attachment.
>
> When using
>
> \override TupletNumber #'X-offset = #10
>
> the text stays on top of the number. Any other way
Dear Ponders, i can't find how to change the placement of the tupletNumber
so that the text "sim." is placed under the "*6*" of my tuplet. See
attachment.
When using
*\override TupletNumber #'X-offset = #10*
the text stays on top of the number. Any other ways to tweak this?
Thank you and all th
Hi again,
> I'm attaching a revised version which works with 2.15.38 which you'll want
> to use instead. (It won't work with 2.14.2.) It's somewhat simplified.
> One thing that you can do with it is change the distance of the number
> from the beam by overriding TupletBracket #'padding (yes, b
Hi Janek,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:42 PM, David Nalesnik
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Janek Warchoł >
> > wrote:
>
>
[ ... ]
> > You get different results for the second tuplet depending on whether the
Hi David,
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:42 PM, David Nalesnik
wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Janek Warchoł
> wrote:
>> That's the true LilyPond way: instead of fixing the same thing all the
>> time, write one fix once and for all - kudos! I wish everyone
>> operated this way.
>
> Thank
Hi Janek,
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 12:02 AM, David Nalesnik
> wrote:
> > Hi Janek,
> >
> >> today i've found this snippet: http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=646[...]
> >
> > Just yesterday I was updating the score which was t
Hi David,
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 12:02 AM, David Nalesnik
wrote:
> Hi Janek,
>
>> today i've found this snippet: http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=646 [...]
>
> Just yesterday I was updating the score which was the reason for me writing
> this in the first place!!
Ah, so it was yours! I didn
Hi,
today i've found this snippet: http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=646
> The description says that it needs manual beaming to work, but i've
> tried using it with 2.15.36 and manual beaming was not necessary!
> The only downside i see is that non-kneed tuplets are positioned
> wrongly, so one
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 5:02 PM, David Nalesnik wrote:
> I'll have to investigate, but possibly the actual override of 'Y-offset
> (or calling other functions related to Y) is having new effects. (You can
> see one effect by adding \override TupletBracket #'bracket-visibility = ##t
> -- no eff
Hi Janek,
today i've found this snippet: http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=646
> The description says that it needs manual beaming to work, but i've
> tried using it with 2.15.36 and manual beaming was not necessary!
> The only downside i see is that non-kneed tuplets are positioned
> wrongly, s
Dear Scheme Heroes,
today i've found this snippet: http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=646
The description says that it needs manual beaming to work, but i've
tried using it with 2.15.36 and manual beaming was not necessary!
The only downside i see is that non-kneed tuplets are positioned
wrongly,
16 matches
Mail list logo
