Re: tuplet number placement and ornament

2012-05-01 Thread James
Hello, On 1 May 2012 08:52, James wrote: > Hello, > > On 1 May 2012 08:31, Nick Payne wrote: >> On 01/05/12 17:06, James wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> On 1 May 2012 06:12, Nick Payne  wrote: On 01/05/12 14:32, Werner LEMBERG wrote: In the following, even though I've t

Re: tuplet number placement and ornament

2012-05-01 Thread James
Hello, On 1 May 2012 08:31, Nick Payne wrote: > On 01/05/12 17:06, James wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> On 1 May 2012 06:12, Nick Payne  wrote: >>> >>> On 01/05/12 14:32, Werner LEMBERG wrote: >>> >>> In the following, even though I've turned off the tuplet bracket >>> stencil, the tuplet

Re: tuplet number placement and ornament

2012-05-01 Thread Nick Payne
On 01/05/12 17:06, James wrote: Hello, On 1 May 2012 06:12, Nick Payne wrote: On 01/05/12 14:32, Werner LEMBERG wrote: In the following, even though I've turned off the tuplet bracket stencil, the tuplet number is still placed as though the stencil was there: [...] I want the number there, b

Re: tuplet number placement and ornament

2012-05-01 Thread James
Hello, On 1 May 2012 06:12, Nick Payne wrote: > On 01/05/12 14:32, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > In the following, even though I've turned off the tuplet bracket > stencil, the tuplet number is still placed as though the stencil > was there: >>> >>> [...] I want the number there, but

Re: tuplet number placement and ornament

2012-04-30 Thread Nick Payne
On 01/05/12 14:32, Werner LEMBERG wrote: In the following, even though I've turned off the tuplet bracket stencil, the tuplet number is still placed as though the stencil was there: [...] I want the number there, but not have it displaced upwards as if the bracket was still there and avoiding th

Re: tuplet number placement and ornament

2012-04-30 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>>> In the following, even though I've turned off the tuplet bracket >>> stencil, the tuplet number is still placed as though the stencil >>> was there: > > [...] I want the number there, but not have it displaced upwards as > if the bracket was still there and avoiding the mordent. I found > su

Re: tuplet number placement and ornament

2012-04-30 Thread Nick Payne
On 30/04/12 16:47, Phil Holmes wrote: - Original Message - From: "Nick Payne" To: Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 7:39 AM Subject: tuplet number placement and ornament In the following, even though I've turned off the tuplet bracket stencil, the tuplet number is still p

Re: tuplet number placement and ornament

2012-04-30 Thread David Nalesnik
Hi again, > Since the number is positioned according to where the bracket would be, > you could override 'positions of TupletBracket: > > \relative c'' { >\set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 4) >\times 2/3 { > g8 fis g > \override TupletBracket #'positions = #'(3.34

Re: tuplet number placement and ornament

2012-04-30 Thread David Nalesnik
Nick, > In the following, even though I've turned off the tuplet bracket >> stencil, the tuplet number is still placed as though the stencil was >> there: >> >> \version "2.15.37" >> >> \relative c'' { >>\set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 4) >>\override TupletBracket #'stenc

Re: tuplet number placement and ornament

2012-04-29 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Nick Payne" To: Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 7:39 AM Subject: tuplet number placement and ornament In the following, even though I've turned off the tuplet bracket stencil, the tuplet number is still placed as though the stencil was th

tuplet number placement and ornament

2012-04-29 Thread Nick Payne
In the following, even though I've turned off the tuplet bracket stencil, the tuplet number is still placed as though the stencil was there: \version "2.15.37" \relative c'' { \set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 4) \override TupletBracket #'stencil = ##f \times 2/3 { g8