t; > {
> > c'4->-.
> > }
> >
> >
> > with:
> >
> > {
> > c'4->--
> > }
> >
> >
> >
> > This last compound articulation is wrong. In the first example the
> > staccato (even though it was typed after the accent)
y below the note-head) and then the accent.
With tenuto-accent, apparently Lilypond expects you to type both
articulations in the right order, which indeed prints a correct
articulation:
{
c'4--->
}
/Enhancement request:/ tenuto-accents should be printed correctly
independently of
Dear list,
compare:
{
c'4->-.
}
with:
{
c'4->--
}
This last compound articulation is wrong. In the first example the staccato
(even though it was typed after the accent) is correctly printed first
(immediately below the note-head) and then the accent. With tenuto-accent,
app
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
yota moteuchi
Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2006 6:01 AM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: combined tenuto + accent
Thank you for you concern.
I thought this request lost in the limbs, I'm glad to see
Thank you for you concern.
I thought this request lost in the limbs, I'm glad to see I was wrong ^^
I'm looking forward to hearing news
'til then
merry Christmas dudes
On 12/24/06, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for the report, entered as
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/is
Thanks for the report, entered as
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=186
Please note that this is a feature request which is much harder to
implement than it may initially appear; it may be a while until this new
feature is added.
Cheers,
- Graham
yota moteuchi wrote:
Hi,
Hi,I am looking for a way to print an articulation made of the combination of an accent (>) and a tenuto (_)of course if I put I get an ugly result where the accent is much wider than the tenuto.
If it's not yet the case these articulations http://www.dolmetsch.com/musictheory21.htm should be adde
