On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 19:12:48 Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > What do you mean?
> > #'merge-differently-dotted does the opposite of what we need -
> > effectively ruining my hack.
> > Please post full example if you have some smart way of typesetting > a > WITHOUT merging t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> What do you mean?
> #'merge-differently-dotted does the opposite of what we need -
> effectively ruining my hack.
> Please post full example if you have some smart way of typesetting a > WITHOUT merging the noteheads.
Yes. Simply add some code to note-collision.cc.
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
>
> Why not use the official solution:
>
> \property Staff.NoteCollision \set #'merge-differently-dotted = ##t
?!?!?!
What do you mean?
#'merge-differently-dotted does the opposite of what we need -
effectively ruining my hack.
Please post full example if you have some sm
Why not use the official solution:
\property Staff.NoteCollision \set #'merge-differently-dotted = ##t
/Mats
> Rune Zedeler wrote:
>
> > < a4 \\ \once \property Voice.Dots \override #'transparent = ##t a4.*2/3 >
> >
> > It probably even ruins the spacing because it adds space for an
> > in
Rune Zedeler wrote:
> < a4 \\ \once \property Voice.Dots \override #'transparent = ##t a4.*2/3 >
>
> It probably even ruins the spacing because it adds space for an
> invisible dot.
Ofcourse the solution to this is to replace the property-setting with
\once \property Voice.Dots \override #'mo
David Bobroff wrote:
> How would I get the two noteheads with
> stems?
Sorry but I can only come up with this very ugly hack:
< a4 \\ \once \property Voice.Dots \override #'transparent = ##t a4.*2/3 >
It probably even ruins the spacing because it adds space for an
invisible dot.
-Rune
___
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002 08:06:44 Graham Percival wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Sep 2002 07:54:07 +
> David Bobroff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
> > >Now, since you have two notes really sounding, you should have
> > >two noteheads. If you had two instruments your notation
> >
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002 07:54:07 +
David Bobroff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
> >Now, since you have two notes really sounding, you should have
> >two noteheads. If you had two instruments your notation
> >would be ok. For solo, it isn't. Sorry.
>
> Ok. I'll mentio
\score{
\notes\relative c'{
as2 < {a} \\ {a} >
}
\paper{}
}
David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
>Now, since you have two notes really sounding, you should have
>two noteheads. If you had two instruments your notation
>would be ok. For solo, it isn't. Sorry.
Ok. I'll mention this to the person
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002 20:33:26 David Bobroff wrote:
> Thanks for the pointer Simon. This was the fix:
>
> \score{
>
>
> \notes\relative c'{
>
> as2 < {a} \\ {a} >
> }
> \paper{}
> }
>
> David Bobroff
Now, since you have two notes really sounding, you should have
two noteheads. If you had t
Thanks for the pointer Simon. This was the fix:
\score{
\notes\relative c'{
as2 < {a} \\ {a} >
}
\paper{}
}
David Bobroff
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
11 matches
Mail list logo
