On Sun, 24 Mar 2019, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
See attached example "staffsize14.ly" and "staffsize14.pdf" output.
Using lilypond 2.19.82 on Linux Fedora.
What's happening here?
I tried some more staffsizes. I'm seeing dispositioned noteheads when
staffsize
Am So., 24. März 2019 um 14:25 Uhr schrieb Martin Tarenskeen
:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> A bumped into a strange bug with a dispositioned notehead.
>
> See attached example "staffsize14.ly" and "staffsize14.pdf" output.
> Using lilypond 2.19.82 on Linux Fedora.
>
> What's happening here?
Looks like
#5303 layo
- Original Message -
From: "Federico Bruni"
To: "Martin Tarenskeen"
Cc: "bug-lilypond mailinglist" ; "lilypond-user
mailinglist"
Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2019 5:14 PM
Subject: Re: Dispositioned notehead in chord when staffsize=14 and clef=bas
Il giorno dom 24 mar 2019 alle 14:22, Martin Tarenskeen
ha scritto:
Hi,
A bumped into a strange bug with a dispositioned notehead.
See attached example "staffsize14.ly" and "staffsize14.pdf" output.
Using lilypond 2.19.82 on Linux Fedora.
What's happening here?
I confirm it. Same prob
sic = \relative c{
\clef bass
4| |
}
\score {
\new Staff {
\mymusic
}
\header { piece = "default staffsize" }
\layout {}
}
\score {
\new Staff {
\mymusic
}
\header { piece = "staffsize 16" }
\layout {
#(layout-set-staff-size 16)
}
}
\sco
lso the wrongly flipped f’s such as to suit
the surrounding notes.
HTH, Simon
Am 03.03.2015 um 15:37 schrieb Cynthia Karl:
The following snippet:
\version "2.19.15"
staffSize = #(define-music-function (parser location new-size) (number?)
#{
\set fontSize = #new-size
\override
Simon Albrecht mail.de> writes:
>
> Well, there’s reason enough to redirect this to bug-lilypond, isn’t
> it?
Thanks for finding the bug, and confirming that it is a bug and not just
a misunderstanding, and narrowing down the cause, and posting to bug-lilypond.
The relevant code did no
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Simon Albrecht
wrote:
> Well, there’s reason enough to redirect this to bug-lilypond, isn’t it?
> Somehow, Mozilla Thunderbird messes up the code examples, so I can’t do so
> well. Perhaps the OP’s and Harm’s first mails in the thread, respectively,
> should suffi
Well, there’s reason enough to redirect this to bug-lilypond, isn’t it?
Somehow, Mozilla Thunderbird messes up the code examples, so I can’t do
so well. Perhaps the OP’s and Harm’s first mails in the thread,
respectively, should suffice for illustration.
~Simon
Am 03.03.2015 um 23:01 schrieb
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 3:59 PM, David Nalesnik
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 3:44 PM, David Nalesnik
> wrote:
>
>> Harm,
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Thomas Morley
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> thanks for testing. So this function may use as a test-case.
>>>
>>> No idea whats causing thi
g output
that the default-direction of the downstemmed F and B is 0--CENTER. This
means that Stem::calc-direction (in lily/stem.cc) will take the property
'neutral-direction. This property is supposed to specify the direction of
a note on the midline--B only in our case. F should have a
def
Harm,
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Thomas Morley
wrote:
>
>
> thanks for testing. So this function may use as a test-case.
>
> No idea whats causing this bug, though. And because I'm not able to
> reproduce it, I can't help furthermore :(
>
I don't think I could do anything either. I wouldn'
gt;>> 2.18.2 still does it correctly.
>>>
>>> I will test my linux machine later.
>>>
>>> I'd say this constitutes a regression? The staffSize function doesn't
>>> seem to do anything fancy or unusual.
>>>
>>> On Tu
Cynthia Karl wrote
> The following snippet:
>
> \version "2.19.15"
>
> staffSize = #(define-music-function (parser location new-size) (number?)
> #{
> \set fontSize = #new-size
> \override StaffSymbol #'staff-space = #(magstep new-size)
> \override
t;
>> I'd say this constitutes a regression? The staffSize function doesn't
>> seem to do anything fancy or unusual.
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
>>
>>> I can confirm the problem on windows. Using a greater range of notes
X (10.9.5) with 2.19.16.
>>
>> 2.18.2 still does it correctly.
>>
>> I will test my linux machine later.
>>
>> I'd say this constitutes a regression? The staffSize function doesn't
>> seem to do anything fancy or unusual.
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 3, 2015
2015-03-03 17:34 GMT+01:00 Kevin Barry :
> The problem also exists on OSX (10.9.5) with 2.19.16.
>
> 2.18.2 still does it correctly.
>
> I will test my linux machine later.
>
> I'd say this constitutes a regression? The staffSize function doesn't seem
> to do any
The problem also exists on OSX (10.9.5) with 2.19.16.
2.18.2 still does it correctly.
I will test my linux machine later.
I'd say this constitutes a regression? The staffSize function doesn't seem
to do anything fancy or unusual.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
Subject: Re: staffSize music function unreliable at LP v2.19.16
No problem on my side (see attached).
OS : Ubuntu 14.10
Frescobaldi 2.13
LP 2.19.16
Here's a compilable code:
\version "2.19.16"
staffSize = #(define-music-function (parser location new-size)
No problem on my side (see attached).
OS : Ubuntu 14.10
Frescobaldi 2.13
LP 2.19.16
Here's a compilable code:
\version "2.19.16"
staffSize = #(define-music-function (parser location new-size)
(number?)
#{
\set fontS
I should add that the original code was missing a right closing brace after
\staffSize #2 to close off the \with block.
James Worlton
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 9:19 AM, James Worlton wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Cynthia Karl wrote:
>
>> The following snippet:
>>
&g
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Cynthia Karl wrote:
> The following snippet:
>
> \version "2.19.15"
>
> staffSize = #(define-music-function (parser location new-size) (number?)
> #{
> \set fontSize = #new-size
> \override StaffSymbol #'staff-sp
The following snippet:
\version "2.19.15"
staffSize = #(define-music-function (parser location new-size) (number?)
#{
\set fontSize = #new-size
\override StaffSymbol #'staff-space = #(magstep new-size)
\override StaffSymbol #'thickness = #(magstep new-size)
#})
linglist :-)
>
> #(set-global-staff-size 13)
> \book{
> % Complete score
> ...
> }
>
> #(set-global-staff-size 20)
> \book{
> % Part 1
> ...
> }
>
> ...
>
>
> /Mats
>
> Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
>> Now what I want is to have a smaller staffsize
lete score, and four pdf's for the individual scores - all from one
Lilypond run.
Now what I want is to have a smaller staffsize for the complete score,
and a normal staffsize for the individual parts for printing.
I have tried
#(set-global-staff-size 13)
and this gives me the result
tiple edit
windows on my computer screen. ) When I print I want a pdf with the
complete score, and four pdf's for the individual scores - all from one
Lilypond run.
Now what I want is to have a smaller staffsize for the complete score,
and a normal staffsize for the individual parts for printing
Dear all,
I have stumbled over en problem with lilypond-book 2.8.1:
Using
\begin[staffsize=11,line-width=128\mm]{lilypond}
\include "../mySong.ly"
\score {
\new Staff = devenu <<
\context Voice = "sopranos" \sopranRefrain
\context Lyric
be bigger (staffsize) as the other staff an should have
bigger notes (fontsize).
as you can see i set the fontsize with "\set fontSize = #+3". But i cannot set
the staff-size the same way --> \set staff-size = #+3
please can anybody tell me how to do this?
much
Hello
I tried to do following.
i have a system with two staffs. It should be a violin-duo.
the first staff should be bigger (staffsize) as the other staff an should have
bigger notes (fontsize).
as you can see i set the fontsize with "\set fontSize = #+3". But i cannot set
the staf
29 matches
Mail list logo
