together. so I
> see 4 beamed 16th notes, and then 4 separate ones. although it don't matter,
> it would look much better if all of the 16th notes beam up. second, sometime
> the stacato dots are not below the notes, but they are above the beams, this
> looks ridiculous. and I
4 separate ones.. although it don't matter, it
would look much better if all of the 16th notes beam up. second, sometime the
stacato dots are not below the notes, but they are above the beams, this looks
ridiculous. and I have no idea how to make a chord with 3 low quarter notes, and
th
h it don't matter, it would look much better if all of the 16th notes beam up. second, sometime the stacato dots are not below the notes, but they are above the beams, this looks ridiculous. and I have no idea how to make a chord with 3 low quarter notes, and the top note is a whole note. it
> "Mats" == Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mats> If you read the section on "Bar check", it says, among
Mats> others:
Mats> "Whenever a bar check is encountered during interpretation, a warning
Mats> message is issued if it doesn't fall at a measure boundary. Thi
> > "Mats" == Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Mats> In older versions, it used to be that a bar check | also
> Mats> inserted a bar line in the output. Now it seems you have to
> Mats> use both | and \bar "|". As far as I understand, the bar check
> Mats> not o
> "Mats" == Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mats> In older versions, it used to be that a bar check | also
Mats> inserted a bar line in the output. Now it seems you have to
Mats> use both | and \bar "|". As far as I understand, the bar check
Mats> not only prints a
Antoniouk Sergio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is looks like very elegant solution, but I am not understand how
> it works. What all of this "s4-. s-." means?
These are spacer notes. I wanted to direct you to the manual, but
it's very minimal. I'll update the entry for .15
> Thank you fo
> I try to enter piece of music with next rythm
>
> 6/8 c8 | c c c c c c | c c c c c c | c c c c c :| c | c c c c c c |
How about
\partial 8
\repeat volta 2 { 8 c8 |
c c c c c c | c c c c c c | c c c c c } c |
c c c c c c
In general, you could also insert a \bar "|" command anywhere
in the
I try to enter piece of music with next rythm
6/8 c8 | c c c c c c | c c c c c c | c c c c c :| c | c c c c c c |
When I try to do it in such way:
%
\score {
\context Voice
\notes
\relative c {
\time 6/8
\partial 8
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Antoniouk Sergio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This is a little strange that lilypond have no ability to do it -
> > music with lot of staccato notes is common case.
>
> That is not strange if you consider LilyPond is a typesetter, not an
> ed
Rune Zedeler wrote:
>
> David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
>
> > Wouldn't it be a lot easier to use a macro in emacs so the resulting .ly
> > file would be readable?
>
> Nope - Emacs-macros are hard to revert. - Suppose that you suddenly
> regret it...
>
> -Rune
I think I didn't put it the right way
Antoniouk Sergio wrote:
> Proposed solution is not good enough because I don't want to set
> staccato mark for each note in piece, just for most of them like
> this
>
> c-. d-. e-. f g a-. h-. c-. d e-. f-. g-. a h-. ... and so on
But then I do not understand how you would prefer the syntax..
David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
> Wouldn't it be a lot easier to use a macro in emacs so the resulting .ly
> file would be readable?
Nope - Emacs-macros are hard to revert. - Suppose that you suddenly
regret it...
-Rune
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EM
Antoniouk Sergio wrote:
>
> > > I try to enter some piece with lot of stacato notes. Is there any
> > > better way then type a lot of "-." like this
> > > "c-. d-. e-. f-. g-. a-. h-. ... and so on"?
> >
> > You could probably do a
Antoniouk Sergio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is a little strange that lilypond have no ability to do it -
> music with lot of staccato notes is common case.
That is not strange if you consider LilyPond is a typesetter, not an
editor or macro processor.
> Proposed solution is not good eno
> > I try to enter some piece with lot of stacato notes. Is there any
> > better way then type a lot of "-." like this
> > "c-. d-. e-. f-. g-. a-. h-. ... and so on"?
>
> You could probably do a Scheme function that adds the scripts
> to e
> I try to enter some piece with lot of stacato notes. Is there any
> better way then type a lot of "-." like this
> "c-. d-. e-. f-. g-. a-. h-. ... and so on"?
You could probably do a Scheme function that adds the scripts
to each note and use it like
\apply #ad
I try to enter some piece with lot of stacato notes. Is there any
better way then type a lot of "-." like this
"c-. d-. e-. f-. g-. a-. h-. ... and so on"?
And second question: can I set different times for different staves?
For example "\time 4/4" for right piano
18 matches
Mail list logo
