Re: scholarly/annotate

2015-11-10 Thread Urs Liska
>> Hi Craig, >> >> actually I see there's nothing *I* have to look into >> right now. Rather you should tell me what you would like >> to achieve. Tell me what - from your experience with an >> actual

Re: scholarly/annotate

2015-11-04 Thread Craig Dabelstein
s Liska : >> >>> >>> Hi Craig, >>> >>> actually I see there's nothing *I* have to look into right now. Rather >>> you should tell me what you would like to achieve. Tell me what - from your >>> experience with an actual project -

Re: scholarly/annotate

2015-11-04 Thread Urs Liska
this package further. > > So far custom properties are just translated into key-value > properties to the LaTeX command. It's then the task of LaTeX > to do something useful with them. As I said the current set-up > simply guarantees that > >

Re: scholarly/annotate

2015-11-02 Thread Craig Dabelstein
t;> Am 29.10.2015 um 22:58 schrieb Craig Dabelstein: >> >> Thanks Urs. I'm working on a 900-page score from 1842 and >> scholarly/annotate is proving invaluable. Thanks for all your hard work on >> this. >> >> Craig >> >> >> On Thu, 29

Re: scholarly/annotate

2015-11-01 Thread Urs Liska
en the task of LaTeX to do something >useful >with them. As I said the current set-up simply guarantees that > >Am 29.10.2015 um 22:58 schrieb Craig Dabelstein: >> Thanks Urs. I'm working on a 900-page score from 1842 and >> scholarly/annotate is proving invaluable. Thanks

Re: scholarly/annotate

2015-11-01 Thread Urs Liska
rs. I'm working on a 900-page score from 1842 and > scholarly/annotate is proving invaluable. Thanks for all your hard > work on this. > > Craig > > > On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 at 18:05 Urs Liska <mailto:u...@openlilylib.org>> wrote: > > I'll have to try

Re: scholarly/annotate

2015-10-29 Thread Craig Dabelstein
Thanks Urs. I'm working on a 900-page score from 1842 and scholarly/annotate is proving invaluable. Thanks for all your hard work on this. Craig On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 at 18:05 Urs Liska wrote: > I'll have to try this on a PC, but for now two remarks: > > You seem to have

Re: scholarly/annotate

2015-10-29 Thread Urs Liska
I'll have to try this on a PC, but for now two remarks: You seem to have misplaced the space before \transposition so this can't be expected to produce anything meaningful. The custom properties that end up in the optional argument (square brackets) don't have any implementation so far. This i

scholarly/annotate

2015-10-29 Thread Craig Dabelstein
Dear Urs (or any other Annotate experts), I have created this entry in my input file, taking the idea from the example given on git: \criticalRemark \with { message = "Originally \\textit{Flauti in F} which is an E\flat\ transposition." original-instrument-key = \key ef \major origina