On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:10:10 +0200
"Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> these functions are quite interesting, but would it be possible to
> have a single function that takes two strings as arguments and makes
> the appropriate composite dynamic mark?
Not that I know of.
> \relative
2008/10/4 Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This version of the files now do the following:
> - commands are placed after the note they belong to -- ie
> \pdolce behaves just like \p. Except for the "dolce" part. :)
Hi graham,
these functions are quite interesting, but would it be possible
> "Graham" == Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The only problem is that the dynamics of the new commands are not
>> reflected in the MIDI output.
Graham> Hmm... I can't get concerned about that. I guess that
Graham> somebody writing piano music might care, but since I write fo
On Sat, 4 Oct 2008 17:57:08 +0100
"Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Graham Percival wrote Saturday, October 04, 2008 4:29 PM
>
> >I have an announcement to make: I'm an idiot.
>
> No need to announce it ;) But if you are so are most
> of us.
Ack! You figured out my secret reaso
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Samstag, 4. Oktober 2008 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
> Graham Percival wrote Saturday, October 04, 2008 4:29 PM
>
> >I have an announcement to make: I'm an idiot.
>
> No need to announce it ;) But if you are so are most
> of us.
At least this shows th
Graham,
I have an announcement to make: I'm an idiot.
Thanks! That saves us from having to say it… ;-)
In my defense, nobody *else* pointed out that \tweak was
*invented* for customizing engraving of the next object in the
input stream, as opposed to \override.
I think everyone else — inc
Graham Percival wrote Saturday, October 04, 2008 4:29 PM
I have an announcement to make: I'm an idiot.
No need to announce it ;) But if you are so are most
of us.
In my defense, nobody *else* pointed out that \tweak was
*invented* for customizing engraving of the next object in the
input
I have an announcement to make: I'm an idiot.
In my defense, nobody *else* pointed out that \tweak was
*invented* for customizing engraving of the next object in the
input stream, as opposed to \override. The following lines fix
the "how do I backwards in time" problem:
'tweaks
(l
Hi Graham,
I have a scheme function for nicely-spaced dynamic+text marks (ie
mp dolce), but it adds the dynamic to the note *after* it appears
in the score -- to add "f legato" to the E, I need to write
c \flegato e d c
instead of
c e\flegato d c
Can anybody see a nice solution to this? Om
2008/10/1 Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Is this possible now? I'm running into this problem.
Yes, me too. But since I use music functions everywhere, I'm getting
used to typing commands before the affected music.
Cheers,
Valentin
___
lilypo
Four years ago, it was impossible to write a music function that
affected the music event it was attached to. (if I understand
this post correctly):
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2004-08/msg00019.html
Is this possible now? I'm running into this problem.
I have a scheme functi
11 matches
Mail list logo
