Am 01.12.2016 um 20:31 schrieb Noeck:
> The *pros* of the edition-engraver with respect to maintainance:
> - You can keep the tweaks separated from the music, so it's easy to find
> all of them and go through them
> - You have to touch less files depending on your setup.
> - Each tweak has a cont
Hi Karl,
convert-ly should work in both cases.
When you have a new version and you want to profit from improvements to
automatic engraving, in both cases you have to go through all manual
changes (tweaks) and see whether they are still necessary and whether
they do the right thing. To keep up wit
Hi Karl,
> Regarding the edition engraver, could it help
> with long term maintainance of scores?
In a certain way, yes: since all tweaks are “external” (i.e., presentation is
separated from content), there is usually no need to “maintain” the note-code
[once it’s complete/correct]. (An obvious
Urs:
> Am 01.12.2016 um 04:21 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
> > > there is a good point in avoiding tweeks, because you can just
> > > wait a few years and then magically you don't need it any longer ---
> > > because lilypond has become so much better and does it for you
> > > automatically.
> > A l
Am 01.12.2016 um 04:21 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
> Hi Karl,
>
>> there is a good point in avoiding tweeks, because you can just
>> wait a few years and then magically you don't need it any longer ---
>> because lilypond has become so much better and does it for you
>> automatically.
> A little
Hi Karl,
> there is a good point in avoiding tweeks, because you can just
> wait a few years and then magically you don't need it any longer ---
> because lilypond has become so much better and does it for you
> automatically.
A little OT, but… If you use the edition-engraver, all tweaks are ex
Joram:
> Am 29.11.2016 um 13:20 schrieb k...@aspodata.se:
> > You know, the main work of Mozarts Requiem was done by a midi to
> > lilypond converter and lilypond itself, my work was mostly framing.
> Well, yes and no. Yes, it shows how capable LilyPond is in creating
> beautiful scores by default
Dear Karl,
Am 29.11.2016 um 13:20 schrieb k...@aspodata.se:
> You know, the main work of Mozarts Requiem was done by a midi to
> lilypond converter and lilypond itself, my work was mostly framing.
Well, yes and no. Yes, it shows how capable LilyPond is in creating
beautiful scores by default. No
Joram:
> even though that was not the OP's intention to get a collection of
> beautiful LilyPond scores, I'd like to express that I am impressed by
> all the engravers' work. You produced really nice scores. And thanks for
> sharing them with this list. I remember the Requiem by Karl, but in
> gene
Jean-Charles Malahieude writes:
> Le 24/11/2016 à 21:11, Thomas Morley a écrit :
>> 2016-11-23 18:53 GMT+01:00 Jean-Charles Malahieude :
>>> Still not finalized, but here are Campra's Festes vénitiennes.
>>> Urtext.ly does'nt generate the MIDIs, as opposed to Conducteur.ly
>>>
>>
>> many thanks f
Le 24/11/2016 à 21:11, Thomas Morley a écrit :
2016-11-23 18:53 GMT+01:00 Jean-Charles Malahieude :
Still not finalized, but here are Campra's Festes vénitiennes.
Urtext.ly does'nt generate the MIDIs, as opposed to Conducteur.ly
many thanks for your score.
I first compiled it with
2.19.51 (v
Thomas Morley writes:
> 2016-11-23 12:33 GMT+01:00 Rutger Hofman :
>> You can check if my typeset of Berg's Adagio (Kammerkonzert) works. It is
>> here: http://imslp.org/wiki/Kammerkonzert_(Berg,_Alban) then under the list
>> of parts, there is a zip with the source, with a Makefile to build scor
2016-11-23 12:33 GMT+01:00 Rutger Hofman :
> You can check if my typeset of Berg's Adagio (Kammerkonzert) works. It is
> here: http://imslp.org/wiki/Kammerkonzert_(Berg,_Alban) then under the list
> of parts, there is a zip with the source, with a Makefile to build score and
> all parts (make -j s
Dear all,
even though that was not the OP's intention to get a collection of
beautiful LilyPond scores, I'd like to express that I am impressed by
all the engravers' work. You produced really nice scores. And thanks for
sharing them with this list. I remember the Requiem by Karl, but in
general th
2016-11-23 18:53 GMT+01:00 Jean-Charles Malahieude :
> Le 23/11/2016 à 11:30, Thomas Morley a écrit :
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> currently there's some ongoing heavy work to make LilyPond work with
>> guilev2.
>>
>> I'd like to test the current state with a huge score, something like
>> an entire sinfony
Thomas Morley writes:
> 2016-11-23 11:30 GMT+01:00 Thomas Morley :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> currently there's some ongoing heavy work to make LilyPond work with guilev2.
>>
>> I'd like to test the current state with a huge score, something like
>> an entire sinfony or the like.
>> I don't have a huge sco
2016-11-23 11:30 GMT+01:00 Thomas Morley :
> Hi all,
>
> currently there's some ongoing heavy work to make LilyPond work with guilev2.
>
> I'd like to test the current state with a huge score, something like
> an entire sinfony or the like.
> I don't have a huge score of this kind at hand.
> May I
Sven Axelsson writes:
> On 23 November 2016 at 11:30, Thomas Morley
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> currently there's some ongoing heavy work to make LilyPond work with
>> guilev2.
>>
>> I'd like to test the current state with a huge score, something like
>> an entire sinfony or the like.
>> I don't
Thomas:
> currently there's some ongoing heavy work to make LilyPond work with guilev2.
>
> I'd like to test the current state with a huge score, something like
> an entire sinfony or the like.
> I don't have a huge score of this kind at hand.
> May I ask if somebody could send me one?
> It should
You can check if my typeset of Berg's Adagio (Kammerkonzert) works. It
is here: http://imslp.org/wiki/Kammerkonzert_(Berg,_Alban) then under
the list of parts, there is a zip with the source, with a Makefile to
build score and all parts (make -j should work). (This is
also a nice test if I rea
On 23 November 2016 at 11:30, Thomas Morley
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> currently there's some ongoing heavy work to make LilyPond work with
> guilev2.
>
> I'd like to test the current state with a huge score, something like
> an entire sinfony or the like.
> I don't have a huge score of this kind at ha
On 23 November 2016 at 12.31.24, Thomas Morley (thomasmorle...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi all,
currently there's some ongoing heavy work to make LilyPond work with guilev2.
I'd like to test the current state with a huge score, something like
an entire sinfony or the like.
I don't have a huge sc
Hi all,
currently there's some ongoing heavy work to make LilyPond work with guilev2.
I'd like to test the current state with a huge score, something like
an entire sinfony or the like.
I don't have a huge score of this kind at hand.
May I ask if somebody could send me one?
It should compile with
23 matches
Mail list logo
