Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am Montag, 10. Februar 2003 09:39 schrieben Sie:
Does it make sense that the following example (using GNU LilyPond 1.6.6)
creates one set of notes and omits the double percent repeat but works
correctly when skipBars = ##f ?
It does
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Am Montag, 10. Februar 2003 09:39 schrieben Sie:
> > Does it make sense that the following example (using GNU LilyPond 1.6.6)
> > creates one set of notes and omits the double percent repeat but works
> > correctly when skipBars = ##f ?
>
> It doesn't and it's an age-
Amelie Zapf wrote:
Am Montag, 10. Februar 2003 09:39 schrieben Sie:
Does it make sense that the following example (using GNU LilyPond 1.6.6)
creates one set of notes and omits the double percent repeat but works
correctly when skipBars = ##f ?
It doesn't and it's an age-old problem that
Am Montag, 10. Februar 2003 09:39 schrieben Sie:
> Does it make sense that the following example (using GNU LilyPond 1.6.6)
> creates one set of notes and omits the double percent repeat but works
> correctly when skipBars = ##f ?
It doesn't and it's an age-old problem that I'm having as well.
Does it make sense that the following example (using GNU LilyPond 1.6.6)
creates one set of notes and omits the double percent repeat but works
correctly when skipBars = ##f ?
\include "paper20.ly"
\score {
\context Staff <
\property Score.skipBars = ##t
\notes {
\repeat "percent" 2 { g
