Re: regression volunteer

2007-11-29 Thread Graham Percival
Alexander Deubelbeiss wrote: Original-Nachricht Datum: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:49:32 +0100 Von: Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> A much more clever way is to use the automated regression testing system, Extremely clever for "day to day" type checks, but for a first pass the

Re: regression volunteer

2007-11-29 Thread Alexander Deubelbeiss
Original-Nachricht > Datum: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:49:32 +0100 > Von: Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > A much more clever way is to use the automated regression testing system, Extremely clever for "day to day" type checks, but for a first pass the actual, individual tests an

Re: regression volunteer

2007-11-29 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Alexander Deubelbeiss wrote: That's why we want a user to volunteer to check the regression tests. It takes about 15 minutes a month, but it would drastically improve the stability of lilypond. Is that "Check the regression tests" as in "regularly go through .../input/regression/collat

regression volunteer

2007-11-29 Thread Alexander Deubelbeiss
> That's why we want a user to volunteer to check the regression tests. > It takes about 15 minutes a month, but it would drastically improve the > stability of lilypond. Is that "Check the regression tests" as in "regularly go through .../input/regression/collated-files and report on which pic