"Anthony W. Youngman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The problem is simple - if I select "scale to fit" then I'm not
> getting an exact image, and if I select "don't scale", the image is
> offset down and right by the non-printable margin.
If the A4 document that you want to print includes (= leav
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mats Bengtsson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
And IME (and I stress IME) pdf doesn't do what it says on the tin,
anyway! In other words, it does NOT print accurately. I would LIKE to
be able to print an A4 pdf on a sheet of A4 paper. It s
Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
And IME (and I stress IME) pdf doesn't do what it says on the tin,
anyway! In other words, it does NOT print accurately. I would LIKE to
be able to print an A4 pdf on a sheet of A4 paper. It seems to me,
however, that whatever I do, Acrobat always sticks the top lef
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Hammar
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Anybody who wants to play tricks with ps files (and I am occasionally
one of them) is free to invoke lilypond --ps, so this is a red herring.
I agree with Laura: we should treat the .ps files are temporar
Karl Hammar wrote:
Yes, that could do it, but one have to add the paper size:
$ ps2ps -dLanguageLevel=2 -sPAPERSIZE=a4 in.ps out.ps
or (which is the same)
$ gs -q -sDEVICE=pswrite -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -dLanguageLevel=2 -sPAPERSIZE=a4
-sOutputFile=out.ps in.ps
That depends on your install
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Karl Hammar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What is the big deal with pdf?
>
> It is only with PDF that one can have hyperlinks in the document for
> example.
Yes and no, you could probably do the same with e.g. a wordprocessor,
html, display postscript, with different pros a
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> So, I too, would rather have lilypond convert automatically to PS
> >> level 2.
> >
> > You can do this manually, saying
> >
> > gs -sDEVICE=pswrite \
> > -dLanguageLevel=2 \
> > -sOutputFile=foo-level2.ps \
> >
Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So, I too, would rather have lilypond convert automatically to PS
>> level 2.
>
> You can do this manually, saying
>
> gs -sDEVICE=pswrite \
> -dLanguageLevel=2 \
> -sOutputFile=foo-level2.ps \
> foo.ps
Ghostscript comes with a tool '
>
> > So, I too, would rather have lilypond convert automatically to PS
> > level 2.
>
> You can do this manually, saying
>
> gs -sDEVICE=pswrite \
> -dLanguageLevel=2 \
> -sOutputFile=foo-level2.ps \
> foo.ps
>
That's what I'm doing currently. But I sometimes forget...
> Mak
> So, I too, would rather have lilypond convert automatically to PS
> level 2.
You can do this manually, saying
gs -sDEVICE=pswrite \
-dLanguageLevel=2 \
-sOutputFile=foo-level2.ps \
foo.ps
Making LilyPond emit level 2 is problematic since it relies on level 3
features.
W
Hello list, hello Gilles,
You wrote:
> So, I too, would rather have lilypond convert automatically to PS level 2.
Me too. :-)
Best Regards Roland
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/li
Hello.
> > Anybody who wants to play tricks with ps files (and I am occasionally
> > one of them) is free to invoke lilypond --ps, so this is a red herring.
> > I agree with Laura: we should treat the .ps files are temporary and
> > delete them. I have a script that does this automatically,
Karl Hammar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What is the big deal with pdf?
It is only with PDF that one can have hyperlinks in the document for
example.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-u
> For me, pdf means trouble. Why should I ever want to produce
> pdf's?
>
> And btw, the pdf's produces by current lilypond does not print
> either
> on my (postscript) printer.
>
> Regards
> /Karl
>
Well, I can print pdf but no ps level 3 with my printer.
But: I would like to print LilyPond gen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Anybody who wants to play tricks with ps files (and I am occasionally
> one of them) is free to invoke lilypond --ps, so this is a red herring.
> I agree with Laura: we should treat the .ps files are temporary and
> delete them. I have a script that does this automaticall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Tim Reeves escreveu:
> > Tom wrote:
> > . . . a somewhat unrelated question: In the creation of a PDF output
> > file, LilyPond creates an intermediate PostScript file. That
> > PostScript file is sometimes viewable using gv and sometimes it gives
> > some errors. But it neve
James E. Bailey wrote:
This would be a bad idea from my point of view, because in order to generate a pdf
that's on a non-standard sheet of paper, I must use the postscript, so not having that
file would make it impossible for me to generate a file that prints on, say,
9"x12" paper.
On Frida
This would be a bad idea from my point of view, because in order to generate a
pdf that's on a non-standard sheet of paper, I must use the postscript, so not
having that file would make it impossible for me to generate a file that prints
on, say, 9"x12" paper.
On Friday, January 12, 2007, at 0
> "Han-Wen" == Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> My question is: can one dispense with the Postscript file
>> altogether? I just use the pdf and always delete the ps file.
>> Is there a way to save a step and processing time by just not
>> producing the ps file in
Tim Reeves escreveu:
>
> Tom wrote:
>
> . . . a somewhat unrelated question: In the creation of a PDF output
> file, LilyPond creates an intermediate PostScript file. That
> PostScript file is sometimes viewable using gv and sometimes it gives
> some errors. But it never prints on any printer I
Le vendredi 12 janvier 2007 à 11:01 -0800, Tim Reeves a écrit :
> Tom wrote:
> >. . . a somewhat unrelated question: In the creation of a PDF output
> >file, LilyPond creates an intermediate PostScript file. That
> >PostScript file is sometimes viewable using gv and sometimes it gives
> >some err
Tom wrote:
. . . a somewhat unrelated question: In the creation of a PDF output
file, LilyPond creates an intermediate PostScript file. That
PostScript file is sometimes viewable using gv and sometimes it gives
some errors. But it never prints on any printer I tried it on
(several HP models, Ges
22 matches
Mail list logo
