Re: problems with repeats-doc, was: afterGrace

2007-05-19 Thread Till Rettig
I would prefer the second one as being more "norm" -- though the first one is also completely understandable. If we would choose the second one I would suggest to replace the paragraph before with something like: "The next example shows a volta repeat with a partial measure. Note that the upbe

Re: problems with repeats-doc, was: afterGrace

2007-05-19 Thread John Mandereau
Le samedi 19 mai 2007 à 12:18 +0300, Till Rettig a écrit : > John Mandereau wrote: > > As always, don't fear asking other questions about unclear docs details > > like the afterGraceFraction thing. > > > ;-) Yes, here is another one! I don't understand the logic behind the > second example > w

problems with repeats-doc, was: afterGrace

2007-05-19 Thread Till Rettig
John Mandereau wrote: What about Chapter 9 "Changing defaults"? It's very practical, and it deals in detail with \tweak, \set and \override. Chapter 5 is only an introduction to tweaking, for beginners. Yes, I see, this is really good enough. If we give working examples in the sections