Am Montag, 3. März 2008 schrieben Sie:
> I added a warning in the snippet's source-code as a comment.
>
> However, this snippet was already tagged as version-specific, so it
> means we were already officially aware that it had some limitations.
Well, the LSR insiders are aware of it, not the users
2008/3/2, Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>If you add \version "2.10.5" to the snippet (yes, I really hate it
> > >>that the snippets don't say with which version of lilypond they
> > >>work!!!) and let convert-ly run on it, you'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Sonntag, 2. März 2008 schrieb Mats Bengtsson:
> Graham Percival wrote:
> >On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 13:00:55 +0100
> >
> >Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>If you add \version "2.10.5" to the snippet (yes, I really hate it
> >>that the sni
Graham Percival wrote:
On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 13:00:55 +0100
Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you add \version "2.10.5" to the snippet (yes, I really hate it
that the snippets don't say with which version of lilypond they
work!!!) and let convert-ly run on it, you'll get the hi
On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 13:00:55 +0100
Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you add \version "2.10.5" to the snippet (yes, I really hate it
> that the snippets don't say with which version of lilypond they
> work!!!) and let convert-ly run on it, you'll get the hint:
LSR uses 2.10.12 at
Dear Reinhold,
thanks for Your tip! It works, but I would prefer the solution with the
pitched trill. The behavior of the accidentals there is really very strange,
as I've read in
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2007-09/msg00465.html
Is there solution available for this problem?
___
Am Sonntag, 2. März 2008 schrieb Stefan Thomas:
> Dear lilypondusers,
> is it possible, that the snippet with the trills with extra-accitendals
> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=304
> don't work on version 2.11.38? When I tried do reproduce it, the
> accidentals where not shown.
Yes.
If you a
Dear lilypondusers,
is it possible, that the snippet with the trills with extra-accitendals
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=304
don't work on version 2.11.38? When I tried do reproduce it, the accidentals
where not shown.
And I have another, very curious problem. When I use \pitchedTrill
someti
