Re: line missing from portato and tenuto

I am using the \portato and \tenuto to add articulations to my music. In both cases the horizontal line does not appear in the PDF. In the case of the portato, the dot does appear so it looks like a staccato. my \staccato and \accent and others that I have tried work fine.

Re: line missing from portato and tenuto

using Adobe Reader 8. It prints the same as >> it >> appears on the screen. >> >> David Bobroff wrote: >> >>> abqconlon wrote: >>> >>>> I am using the \portato and \tenuto to add articulations to my music. >>>> In &g

Re: line missing from portato and tenuto

> >> David Bobroff wrote: >> >>> abqconlon wrote: >>> >>>> I am using the \portato and \tenuto to add articulations to my music. >>>> In >>>> both >>>> cases the horizontal line does not appear in the PDF. In the

Re: line missing from portato and tenuto

the same as it appears on the screen. David Bobroff wrote: abqconlon wrote: I am using the \portato and \tenuto to add articulations to my music. In both cases the horizontal line does not appear in the PDF. In the case of the portato, the dot does appear so it looks like a staccato. my

Re: line missing from portato and tenuto

Bob, thanks for asking. I am using Adobe Reader 8. It prints the same as it appears on the screen. David Bobroff wrote: > > abqconlon wrote: >> I am using the \portato and \tenuto to add articulations to my music. In >> both >> cases the horizontal line does not appear

Re: line missing from portato and tenuto

abqconlon wrote: I am using the \portato and \tenuto to add articulations to my music. In both cases the horizontal line does not appear in the PDF. In the case of the portato, the dot does appear so it looks like a staccato. my \staccato and \accent and others that I have tried work fine. One

line missing from portato and tenuto

I am using the \portato and \tenuto to add articulations to my music. In both cases the horizontal line does not appear in the PDF. In the case of the portato, the dot does appear so it looks like a staccato. my \staccato and \accent and others that I have tried work fine. -- View this message

Re: portato

It seems that a few LaTeX command has survived in the manual by mistake. The proper syntax is c-_ /Mats Mehmet Okonsar wrote: I couldn't figure this out.. Ver.2.7.4 The manual gives: -\_.. it doesn't work.. Best Regards, Mehmet Okonsar, pianist-composer www.okonsar.com ___

portato

I couldn't figure this out.. Ver.2.7.4 The manual gives: -\_.. it doesn't work.. Best Regards, Mehmet Okonsar, pianist-composer www.okonsar.com ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user