Hi there,
> I use \partCombine quite extensively, and have observed that it's very
> finicky when it comes to dynamics.
Agreed.
> This applies not only to dynamics per se, but also to any additional
> events in the two parts aside from notes
Yes.
> Because of these issues, I have resorted to t
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 06:34:52AM -0400, David Santamauro wrote:
> I believe this is all related to the dynamics (more to the point, the
> termination: \!. If we forget the misplacement of “Solo” for a moment
> and observe the behavior of \partCombine with just the dynamics, it
> seems to have rea
I believe this is all related to the dynamics (more to the point, the
termination: \!. If we forget the misplacement of “Solo” for a moment and
observe the behavior of \partCombine with just the dynamics, it seems to have
real difficulties with dynamics termination.
\version "2.22.2"
\include
From: Aaron Hill
On 2022-03-23 1:52 am, David Santamauro wrote:
> > mm 1- 3 and 3-6 are note-identical. The only difference is the
> > decrescendo in m. 1, terminated in m. 2. I believe the terminating
> > decrescendo in vTwo/m. 2 causes the partCombine code to think there's
> > music in vTwo/m.
On 2022-03-23 1:52 am, David Santamauro wrote:
mm 1- 3 and 3-6 are note-identical. The only difference is the
decrescendo in m. 1, terminated in m. 2. I believe the terminating
decrescendo in vTwo/m. 2 causes the partCombine code to think there's
music in vTwo/m. 2 -- I could be wrong, but the re
Hi,
The MWE …
%%
\version "2.22.2"
\include "english.ly"
vOne = \relative {
c''1\> c1\! c1 \bar "||"
c1 c1 c1
}
vTwo = \relative {
e'1\> R1\! R1
e1 R1 R1
}
\score {
<<
\new Staff \vOne
\new Staff \vTwo
\new Staff \partCombine #'(0 . 0) \vOne \vTwo
>>
\layout {
