Roland Goretzki wrote:
Hello list, hello Paul,
Oh, it was my turn for misunderstanding (I'm not firm in English)-:
You wrote:
Take care,
These were the words, which me let believe, You could have feeled
attacked by me.
It's not as well known as some greetings.
I didn't see this until yet
Hello list, hello Paul,
Oh, it was my turn for misunderstanding (I'm not firm in English)-:
You wrote:
> Take care,
These were the words, which me let believe, You could have feeled
attacked by me.
I didn't see this until yet as a greeting form ... :)
Okay,
Best Regards Roland
--
Roland Goretzki wrote:
Hello list, hello Paul,
You wrote:
Roland Goretzki wrote:
[ ... ]
Excuse me, but I think, this would make no sense,
if the bug would be in both, 2.4.0-2 AND 2.4.1,
as I assume ... :-(
I am running Debian sid. I am working quite well with 2.4.0-2.
I updated to
Hello list, hello Paul,
You wrote:
> Roland Goretzki wrote:
>
> [ ... ]
> >Excuse me, but I think, this would make no sense,
> >if the bug would be in both, 2.4.0-2 AND 2.4.1,
> >as I assume ... :-(
> >
> I am running Debian sid. I am working quite well with 2.4.0-2.
> I updated to 2.4.1-1, s
Roland Goretzki wrote:
Hello list, hello Paul,
You wrote:
Sébastien Lardière wrote:
$ lilypond-snapshot deus_en-dro_darger-2.4.0.ly
GNU LilyPond 2.4.1
ERROR: In procedure primitive-load-path:
ERROR: Unable to find file "lily.scm" in load path
But lily.scm is found :
$ dpkg -S lily.scm
lil
On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 02:35:24 -0700, Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> I just notified Pedro of this bug. I just went back to 2.4.0-2.
>
> If you haven't cleaned your cache you can do:
>
> dpkg -r lilypond-snapshot
> dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/lilypond-snapshot_2.4.0-2_i386.deb
>
Hello list, hello Paul,
You wrote:
> Sébastien Lardière wrote:
>
> >$ lilypond-snapshot deus_en-dro_darger-2.4.0.ly
> >GNU LilyPond 2.4.1
> >ERROR: In procedure primitive-load-path:
> >ERROR: Unable to find file "lily.scm" in load path
> >
> >But lily.scm is found :
> >
> >$ dpkg -S lily.scm
>
Sébastien Lardière wrote:
On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 20:48:48 -0200, Pedro Kroger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
dax2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
What is happening? What could I do for making better PDF or PNG output ?
It can't find the fonts. A few people are having trouble with my package
a
On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 20:48:48 -0200, Pedro Kroger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> dax2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> What is happening? What could I do for making better PDF or PNG output ?
>
> It can't find the fonts. A few people are having trouble with my package
> and I can't reproduce or fi
dax2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> What is happening? What could I do for making better PDF or PNG output ?
It can't find the fonts. A few people are having trouble with my package
and I can't reproduce or figure out why. Could you try the 2.4.1 version
I'll upload in about one hour?
BTW, what
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 22:30:03 +0100
Sébastien wrote:
> I just tried lilypond 2.4.0 with a sheet converted from 2.2.0; it works well.
>
> The DVI output is OK, but the PDF, PS and PNG don't display note
> symbols, as you can see here : http://seb.ouvaton.org/tmp/tabs/.
>
> What is happening? What
Hello
I just try lilypond 2.4.0 with a sheet convert from 2.2.0, which works well.
The dvi output is Ok, but the Pdf, Ps and Png don't display note
symbol, as you can see here : http://seb.ouvaton.org/tmp/tabs/.
What's happen ? What could i do for making better Pdf or Png output ?
I use Pedro
12 matches
Mail list logo
