Quoting may be screwed up:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 01:26:36PM +0100, Erik Sandberg wrote:
>
> > Starting at version 2.6, lilypond handles fonts etc. in a completely
> > different
> > way (without using TeX), so the smoothest fix could be to install version
> > 2.6.
>
> On the debian web sit
Hi.
>
> But, the quality of my pdf files is very poor. Notes and staff lines
> etc look ugly. Probably this is a font problem, but I do not know how
> to proceed.
>
Try to install the font package from there:
http://lilypond.org/download/fonts/
Gilles
_
On Thursday 12 January 2006 09.01, debian wrote:
> Please,
>
> I have just started using Lilypond (2.4.5) on a debian sarge system
> and I am getting on reasonably well with the syntax.
>
> But, the quality of my pdf files is very poor. Notes and staff lines
> etc look ugly. Probably this is a fo
debian wrote:
> Please,
>
> I have just started using Lilypond (2.4.5) on a debian sarge system
> and I am getting on reasonably well with the syntax.
>
> But, the quality of my pdf files is very poor. Notes and staff lines
> etc look ugly. Probably this is a font problem, but I do not know how
It seems that you have some installation problems, even though it's hard
to say exactly what the problem is without seeing an example PDF file
and the printouts of
lilypond --verbose yourfile.ly
On the other hand, I really recommend to install LilyPond version 2.6
instead. It has several improvem
Are you referring to printed output or screen display of the pdf?
Different PDF viewers and ghostscript libraries seem to produce different
results on screen, sometimes in some fairly problematic ways. I have seen
no problems when I've printed to paper, however.
Josiah
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, d
Please,
I have just started using Lilypond (2.4.5) on a debian sarge system
and I am getting on reasonably well with the syntax.
But, the quality of my pdf files is very poor. Notes and staff lines
etc look ugly. Probably this is a font problem, but I do not know how
to proceed.
Thanks
Joe
