Paul Scott wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
If you can't do "info lilypond", then look into the way you install
lilypond and your info system. My guess is that the recent GUB
lilypond installations don't touch info, so you'd need to tweak your
info setup.
Any idea how? I run GUBs on Debian sid.
Graham Percival wrote:
Paul Scott wrote:
Ignorant question: What is the relationship between the HTML manual
and the TeXinfo manual? I have at times been able to do "info
lilypond" but not currently.
The Texinfo manual is a manual about texinfo. That's what Karl added
info to.
Aah!
Paul Scott wrote:
Karl Berry wrote:
> Sure, I suppose at least the main keyboard shortcuts
could/should be in
> the manual.
Agreed.
I added info about the keyboard shortcuts to the Texinfo manual
yesterday.
Ignorant question: What is the relationship between the HTML manual an
Karl Berry wrote:
> Sure, I suppose at least the main keyboard shortcuts could/should be in
> the manual.
Agreed.
I added info about the keyboard shortcuts to the Texinfo manual yesterday.
Ignorant question: What is the relationship between the HTML manual and
the TeXinfo manual
Karl Berry wrote:
([EMAIL PROTECTED] Hmm, never heard of it ... trying bug-texinfo)
>> Has anyone considered putting the navigation links at the bottom
You're the first person to suggest it that I know of. It sounds
reasonable to me, although it would look kind of funny on very short
node
-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Trevor Baô a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, lilypond-user@gnu.org,
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Karl Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: navigating web documentation
Trevor Baô a schreef:
> (I second this, es
On 7/7/06, Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Trevor Bača schreef:
>> (I second this, especially since I've been reading pages continuously
>> through much more with the newer manual ...)
>>
>> On 6/29/06, Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Has anyone considere
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Trevor Bača schreef:
(I second this, especially since I've been reading pages continuously
through much more with the newer manual ...)
On 6/29/06, Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Has anyone considered putting the navigation links at the bottom of our
wonderful! (
Trevor Bača schreef:
(I second this, especially since I've been reading pages continuously
through much more with the newer manual ...)
On 6/29/06, Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Has anyone considered putting the navigation links at the bottom of our
wonderful! (Thanks, Graham and others
I guess it can be done by hacking the file stepmake/bin/add-html-footer.py
which is used to add the footer to all the HTML files at lilypond.org.
/Mats
Graham Percival wrote:
Paul Scott wrote:
Has anyone considered putting the navigation links at the bottom of
our wonderful! (Thanks, Graha
Paul Scott wrote:
Has anyone considered putting the navigation links at the bottom of our
wonderful! (Thanks, Graham and others) documentaion pages in
addition to at the top?
That's a nice idea, but I'm not interested in implementing it myself.
The web pages are built with texinfo; if you
(I second this, especially since I've been reading pages continuously
through much more with the newer manual ...)
On 6/29/06, Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Has anyone considered putting the navigation links at the bottom of our
wonderful! (Thanks, Graham and others) documentaion pag
Has anyone considered putting the navigation links at the bottom of our
wonderful! (Thanks, Graham and others) documentaion pages in
addition to at the top? I usually find myself scrolling to the bottom
of the page (some of which are quite long) and then having to scroll
back up to the top
13 matches
Mail list logo
