Re: music function not duplicating manual "equivalent"

Hi Nicolas, > Itt is the conjonction of `q', \relative and #{ #} syntax which gives > the undesired result, as is demonstrated in the following example: Nice catch! > I don't see yet how to solve that problem, I'm adding an issue to the tracker. >

Re: music function not duplicating manual "equivalent"

Le 4 juin 2010 à 18:13, Kieren MacMillan a écrit : > Hey all! > > Can anyone explain what's going wrong here? [The scores are intended/expected > to have identical output, i.e., the first version.] > Is it the q "function" that's messing me up, or my \split function? Itt is the conjonction of `

Re: music function not duplicating manual "equivalent"

Kieren, I don't know about version 2.13.22, but the scores come out identically in 2.12.3 (with adjustments for the chord repeat command). David ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

music function not duplicating manual "equivalent"

Hey all! Can anyone explain what's going wrong here? [The scores are intended/expected to have identical output, i.e., the first version.] Is it the q "function" that's messing me up, or my \split function? Thanks, Kieren. _ \version "2.13.22" \include "english.ly" qTheMusic =