pond users
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: multimeasuerrest breve too wide
I found some related ugliness. If the spacers are changed to rests, the problem
goes away.
<<
{ c'4 s2. c'4 s2. c'8 s2.. c'16 s2... }
{ R1*4 }
Using transparent
As a workaround you could omit the spacer like this:
<<
{ c'4*8 c' c' }
{ \time 8/4 c'4 r r2 r1 R\breve c'4 r r2 r1 }
>>
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/multimeasuerrest-breve-too-wide-tp166355p166359.html
Sent
om: Neil Thornock
> To: Lilypond users
> Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 1:27 PM
> Subject: Re: multimeasuerrest breve too wide
>
>
>
> I found some related ugliness. If the spacers are changed to rests, the
> problem goes away.
>
> <<
> { c'4 s2. c'
Sublimely ugly, but this works:
{ c'8[ \hide Rest \repeat unfold 7 r8 c'8 \repeat unfold 7 r8 c'8] \repeat
unfold 7 r8 }
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Neil Thornock
To: Lilypond users
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: multimeasuerrest
I found some related ugliness. If the spacers are changed to rests, the
problem goes away.
<<
{ c'4 s2. c'4 s2. c'8 s2.. c'16 s2... }
{ R1*4 }
>>
Using transparent rests won't work for me because I need a beam extending
over the whole top staff, like so:
{ c'8[ s2.. c'8 s2.. c'8] s2.. }
A r
The double whole rest forces the measure too wide in this example, as if
making room for notes that aren't there. Any ideas how to shorten the
measure up to be, at least, no longer than the other measures?
<<
{ c'4 s1.. c'4 s1.. c'4 s1.. }
{ \time 8/4 c'4 r r2 r1 R\breve c'4 r r2 r1 }
>>
_
