> > /Mats
> Sorry, I don't understand this row.
> That's my name!
Sorry, I wasn't carefully. I new in the list and the english. (I still
learning these things.)
> The recommended approach is ly2dvi -P test.ly
I tryed it and work fine. Many thanks.
> > /Mats
> Sorry, I don't understand this row.
> That's my name!
Sorry, I wasn't carefully. I new in the list and the english. (I still
learning these things.)
> The recommended approach is ly2dvi -P test.ly
I tryed it and work fine. Many thanks.
> > /Mats
> Sorry, I don't understand this row.
> That's my name!
Sorry, I wasn't carefully. I new in the list and the english. (I still
learning these things.)
> The recommended approach is ly2dvi -P test.ly
I tryed it and work fine. Many thanks.
> > /Mats
> Sorry, I don't understand this row.
> That's my name!
Sorry, I wasn't carefully. I new in the list and the english. (I still
learning these things.)
> The recommended approach is ly2dvi -P test.ly
I tryed it and work fine. Many thanks.
> > /Mats
> Sorry, I don't understand this row.
> That's my name!
Sorry, I wasn't carefully. I new in the list and the english. (I still
learning these things.)
> The recommended approach is ly2dvi -P test.ly
I tryed it and work fine. Many thanks.
> > /Mats
> Sorry, I don't understand this row.
> That's my name!
Sorry, I wasn't carefully. I new in the list and the english. (I still
learning these things.)
> The recommended approach is ly2dvi -P test.ly
I tryed it and work fine. Many thanks.
> > /Mats
> Sorry, I don't understand this row.
> That's my name!
Sorry, I wasn't carefully. I new in the list and the english. (I still
learning these things.)
> The recommended approach is ly2dvi -P test.ly
I tryed it and work fine. Many thanks.
> > /Mats
> Sorry, I don't understand this row.
> That's my name!
Sorry, I wasn't carefully. I new in the list and the english. (I still
learning these things.)
> The recommended approach is ly2dvi -P test.ly
I tryed it and work fine. Many thanks.
> No. I try this command:
> lilypond -f ps test.ly
> and I get test.ps file. The ps pile "contain" missing numbers.
Don't use lilypond -f ps, it has never been stable enough
for any serious typesetting. The recommended approach is
ly2dvi -P test.ly
see the Tutorial.
/Mats
Hi!
Thanks your answer.
> I assume that you have installed your current Lilypond 1.4.10
> from an RPM, or did you compile it yourself?
I get SuSE linux 8.0 distribution. The SuSE 8.0 contain the recompiled
lilypond version (in rpm). When I installed the linux distribution I
requested lilypond pa
First of all, I recommend to update to the new stable Lilypond
release 1.6.0.
I assume that you have installed your current Lilypond 1.4.10
from an RPM, or did you compile it yourself?
How did you process the file, did you use ly2dvi -P test.ly?
Have you tried to view the .dvi file in xdvi (or k
Hi!
I have a SuSE linux 7.2 and 8.0. I like to use lilypond make a ps file
from manual note. When I compile from test.ly file to test.ps file. I
cannot get error. When I have look at the ps file some number missing.
My own test.ly file:
% Creator: I am, at Sun Aug 11 17:20:18 2002
header
{ tit
12 matches
Mail list logo
