On Fri 17 Apr 2020 at 22:32:47 (+1000), Andrew Bernard wrote:
> My memory may be faulty but I thought lilypond when compiling reports
> on missing fonts. Version 2.20.0 does not. Is there a way to enable
> this instaed of only silently substituting (which sometimes I don't
> notic
My memory may be faulty but I thought lilypond when compiling reports
on missing fonts. Version 2.20.0 does not. Is there a way to enable
this instaed of only silently substituting (which sometimes I don't
notice when in a hurry).
Hello list, hello Graham,
You wrote:
> From the documentation, 13.2:
> "Running dvips will produce some warnings about fonts; these are
> harmless and may be ignored."
>
> Does that help?
Oh, yes, it does.
I've thought something like that, but wasn't shure. :-)
Thanks and Best Regards
On 14-May-06, at 3:43 PM, Roland Goretzki wrote:
This is dvips(k) 5.92b Copyright 2002 Radical Eye Software
(www.radicaleye.com)
' TeX output 2006.05.15:0028' -> donatas-1.-buch.ps
dvips: Font Aybabtu-Regular used in file lily-1732791014-1.eps is
not in the mapping file.
dvips: Font C
Hi,
with version 2.8.2-2
lilypond-book works quite fine, and the output is okay, as far as I can
see, but I get the following message:
This is dvips(k) 5.92b Copyright 2002 Radical Eye Software
(www.radicaleye.com)
' TeX output 2006.05.15:0028' -> donatas-1.-buch.ps
dvips: Font Aybabtu-Reg
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> The file structure is somewhat different in the teTeX 3 distribution
> compared to teTeX 2. The corresponding changes were introduced for the
> LilyPond files in version 2.4.5, but maybe the ec fonts package that
> you use hasn't been updated correspondingly?
That may be it
The file structure is somewhat different in the teTeX 3 distribution
compared to teTeX 2. The corresponding changes were introduced for the
LilyPond files in version 2.4.5, but maybe the ec fonts package that
you use hasn't been updated correspondingly?
/Mats
Doug Asherman wrote:
Hi:
I think I m
Hi:
I think I may have seen something about this on the list already. I
can't seem to find the pertinent posts.
When running the combination of Lilypond 2.4.5 and teTeX 3.0 under
Linux, Lilypond can't seem to find the ec fonts. The .ps and .pdf files
are missing all those fonts.
I can get someth
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002 21:19:29 +0200
Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This all looks OK! If you built Lilypond yourself, you
> also have to build Type1 versions of the fonts to get
> good-looking PDF files. To do that, you need to install
> mftrace (see INSTALL.txt) and run
Oh, so that's
This all looks OK! If you built Lilypond yourself, you
also have to build Type1 versions of the fonts to get
good-looking PDF files. To do that, you need to install
mftrace (see INSTALL.txt) and run
- make pfa-fonts
- make MAKE_PFA_FILES=1 install
(these instructions should definitely be in INSTAL
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002 14:53:50 +0200
Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - What is the environment variable $TEXMF set to?
$ echo $TEXMF
{/opt/programs/share/lilypond/1.7.3,{/opt/programs/share/lilypond/1.7.3
,!!/usr/share/texmf}}
> - What does the command 'kpsewhich feta20.mf' return?
$ k
I don't have an answer but some question that might help
us figure why it doesn't work:
- What is the environment variable $TEXMF set to?
- What does the command 'kpsewhich feta20.mf' return?
- Have you checked the .pdf file produced by ly2dvi -p?
Does it look OK?
- Is the .ps file OK if you use
12 matches
Mail list logo
