On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 08:16:58PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> Unfortunately, I didn't find the time to scan that part of B&H edition. If
[...]
Ha! I finally did what an more intelligent beeing would have done first:
open collated-files.html and search for `shift'.
Attached you can find an im
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 09:59:29AM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> > As far as I can see, LilyPond does the same as B& H most of the time. Only
> > that critical situation in my example is handled differently.
>
> How?
By putting the stem-down, dotted eight *right* of the stem-up chord. I
try a
Matthias Kilian writes:
>> Does B&H arrange the heads in the same way as LilyPond?
>
> As far as I can see, LilyPond does the same as B& H most of the time. Only
> that critical situation in my example is handled differently.
How?
> I think it's good in sense of engraving style, especially spaci
On Sun, 1 Feb 2004 20:46:15 +0100
Matthias Kilian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you also own the B&H Edition? If so, what do you think about the
> engraving? (See Jan's mail and my reply to it)
I saw Jan's answer and I tried to find my copy.
I have an ed.Peters piano arrangement for the left-
On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 01:50:10PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> > \version "2.1.15"
> > \score {
> > \notes \relative c {
> > \time 1/4
> > \key d \minor
> > \clef bass
> > << 4 \\ {g'8. bes16} >>
> > }
> > \paper {}
> > }
>
> Does B&H arrange the heads in the same way a
Hi Donald.
On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 04:54:48AM +0100, donald_j_axel wrote:
> > This will misplace the dotted g (stem-down) left of the chord
> > (stem-up), with the dot running straight into the chord. Breitkopf &
> > Härtel put it right of the chord.
>
> I have made some experiments (Busoni2.png)
Matthias Kilian writes:
> HEAD works fine for me. However, I just ran into the next problem (I
> hope that's a newbie error rather a bug):
>
> \version "2.1.15"
> \score {
> \notes \relative c {
> \time 1/4
> \key d \minor
> \clef bass
> << 4 \\ {g'8. bes16} >>
> }
> \paper {
On Sun, 1 Feb 2004 00:18:56 +0100
Matthias Kilian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This will misplace the dotted g (stem-down) left of the chord
> (stem-up), with the dot running straight into the chord. Breitkopf &
> Härtel put it right of the chord.
I have made some experiments (Busoni2.png).
\ve
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 23:13:07 +0100
Matthias Kilian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> %% changed from version 2.1.15
> \version "2.1.0"
> \score {
> \notes \relative c' {
> \property Staff.NoteCollision \set #'merge-differently-dotted = ##t
> \time 3/4
> \key d \minor
> f8 g16 a << {be
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 01:14:32PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> You found a bug. The dot-collision/merging code was rewritten in 2.1.
> It turned out that merging removed any dots were removed from the
> lower nothead:
[...]
> Fixed in CVS.
HEAD works fine for me. However, I just ran into th
Matthias Kilian writes:
> rather new to LilyPond and keen to experiment, I started to write
> Busonis famous piano transcription of Bachs chaconne in d minor from bwv
> 1004. Using the printout of Breitkopf & Härtel, I'm currently stuck on
> the following:
You found a bug. The dot-collision/merg
Hi,
rather new to LilyPond and keen to experiment, I started to write
Busonis famous piano transcription of Bachs chaconne in d minor from bwv
1004. Using the printout of Breitkopf & Härtel, I'm currently stuck on
the following:
\version "2.1.15"
\score {
\notes \relative c' {
\property Sta
12 matches
Mail list logo
