Re: miss-aligned dynamic in presence of chords with reverse noteheads

2025-01-06 Thread Richard Shann
On Mon, 2025-01-06 at 13:33 +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > Richard Shann writes: > > > On Mon, 2025-01-06 at 05:44 -0500, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > > > Hi Richard, > > > > > > > the tweak needs to vanish when the part is being typeset, > > > > but I can cope with that ok. > > > > > > You know ab

Re: miss-aligned dynamic in presence of chords with reverse noteheads

2025-01-06 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi David, > Date: Sat Aug 30 21:35:56 2003 + >* scm/music-functions.scm (remove-tag): filter \tagged music >expressions. > >* input/regression/tag-filter.ly (texidoc): new file. > >* lily/parser.yy (post_event): add \tag #'symbol / \tag #'(symbol1 >symbol2 .. ) etc. >

Re: miss-aligned dynamic in presence of chords with reverse noteheads

2025-01-06 Thread David Kastrup
Richard Shann writes: > On Mon, 2025-01-06 at 05:44 -0500, Kieren MacMillan wrote: >> Hi Richard, >> >> > the tweak needs to vanish when the part is being typeset, >> > but I can cope with that ok. >> >> You know about the \tag system, yes? > > yes indeed - although it would be quite possible t

Re: miss-aligned dynamic in presence of chords with reverse noteheads

2025-01-06 Thread Richard Shann
On Mon, 2025-01-06 at 05:44 -0500, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > Hi Richard, > > > the tweak needs to vanish when the part is being typeset, > > but I can cope with that ok. > > You know about the \tag system, yes? yes indeed - although it would be quite possible to insert tags via Denemo this was a

Re: miss-aligned dynamic in presence of chords with reverse noteheads

2025-01-06 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Richard, > the tweak needs to vanish when the part is being typeset, > but I can cope with that ok. You know about the \tag system, yes? Cheers, Kieren. __ My work day may look different than your work day. Please do not feel obligated to read or

Re: miss-aligned dynamic in presence of chords with reverse noteheads

2025-01-06 Thread Richard Shann
On Sun, 2025-01-05 at 16:18 -0500, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > Hi Richard, > > Maybe just tweak it to the left a little…? Thank you - I'll use this as the starting point for a workaround - the tweak needs to vanish when the part is being typeset, but I can cope with that ok. Richard > > %%%  SNI

Re: miss-aligned dynamic in presence of chords with reverse noteheads

2025-01-06 Thread Richard Shann
On Sun, 2025-01-05 at 17:25 -0500, Saul Tobin wrote: > Hm. This is *supposed* to be the situation where \override > DynamicText.X-align-on-main-noteheads = ##t (which is the default > actually) saves the day. And if the \sf is attached directly to the > chord, it does. But when it's in a different

Re: miss-aligned dynamic in presence of chords with reverse noteheads

2025-01-05 Thread Saul Tobin
Hm. This is *supposed* to be the situation where \override DynamicText.X-align-on-main-noteheads = ##t (which is the default actually) saves the day. And if the \sf is attached directly to the chord, it does. But when it's in a different staff context, it doesn't do anything, since DynamicText lack

Re: miss-aligned dynamic in presence of chords with reverse noteheads

2025-01-05 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Richard, Maybe just tweak it to the left a little…? %%% SNIPPET BEGINS \version "2.24" \layout { ragged-right = ##f line-width = 5\in } upper = { g''4 r8 d'' d''2 } dyns = { s4. s8-\tweak X-offset #-0.5 \sf s2 } lowest = { g'4 e'8 r2 % g'4 e'8 c' r2 } \score { <<

miss-aligned dynamic in presence of chords with reverse noteheads

2025-01-04 Thread Richard Shann
In a large orchestral piece it was noticed that a dynamic under a note was slightly displaced to the right. It turned out that this was because many staffs below there was a chord with notes on both sides of the stem (because only a semitone apart). The dynamic was placed in a dynamics staff as