Am 13.01.2014 09:34, schrieb Bric:
[...]
Not to digress from lilypond /too/ much, but FWIW, some default patches
for the timidity(++) on my Ubuntu sound significantly better than the
ones in the FluidR3 soundfont (strings, for instance). I am talking
about the quality (verisimilitude) and beauty
On 01/11/2014 09:51 AM, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jan 2014, Noeck wrote:
But you can do better than default timidity:
timidity/timidity++ has no default soundfont. In fact it doesn't have
a soundfont at all. It's the distributions that provide a soundfont or
patchset and use thi
On Sat, 11 Jan 2014, Noeck wrote:
But you can do better than default timidity:
timidity/timidity++ has no default soundfont. In fact it doesn't have a
soundfont at all. It's the distributions that provide a soundfont or
patchset and use this as default.
But if you want to use another sou
Am 11.01.2014 07:39, schrieb David Kastrup:
> Bric writes:
>
>> trying random instruments from the list of instruments on this page:
>> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/midi-instruments
>>
>> here are the values for which my timidity (version 2.13.2) creates an
>> audible
Bric writes:
> trying random instruments from the list of instruments on this page:
> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/midi-instruments
>
> here are the values for which my timidity (version 2.13.2) creates an
> audible track (a few picked at random):
>
> cello
> x
trying random instruments from the list of instruments on this page:
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/midi-instruments
here are the values for which my timidity (version 2.13.2) creates an
audible track (a few picked at random):
cello
xylophone
pan flute
