Thank you all!
Haipeng
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hello...
-Original Message-
From: Graham Percival
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 10:34:38 +
To: James Lowe
Cc: 胡海鹏 - Hu Haipeng , lilypond-user
Subject: Re: mezzo staccato
>Off the top of my head, I would play:
> c4-.( c4-. c4-.)
>with something like 30% of the note duration
-Original Message-
From: 胡海鹏 - Hu Haipeng
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 18:32:51 +0800
To: James Lowe
Subject: Re:Re: mezzo staccato
>Thank you very much! THen, what's the difference (visual shape or
>position) between c-- and c-_?
>Haipeng
>
>
>
Ah...that's in
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 10:20:53AM +, James Lowe wrote:
> Hiapeng,
>
> >In my theory book, a mezzo staccato is a line plus staccato. But I
> >don't know whether c4-.-- does this correctly.
This works, as does
c4-_
> If the notes are tied I just used somethi
Hiapeng,
-Original Message-
From: 胡海鹏 - Hu Haipeng
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 17:35:18 +0800
To: lilypond-user
Subject: mezzo staccato
>Hello,
> I ever asked 3 signs, and 2 (portato and martellato) have been solved.
>Now I just finished my second orchestral work and am revi
> And anyway, the notation manual contains pictures of the various
> accents, and apparently the combination is called "tenuto" and has
> its own entry syntax and shorthand.
The question is whether the verbal descriptions in the manual are
expressive enough so that blind users like Hai-Ping have
think it's not correct, because it's
> just a line. In my theory book, a mezzo staccato is a line plus
> staccato. But I don't know whether c4-.-- does this correctly. Are
> these two signs work as one in this circumstance? Or are they far from
> each other?
I don't
ust a line. In my theory book, a mezzo
staccato is a line plus staccato. But I don't know whether c4-.-- does this
correctly. Are these two signs work as one in this circumstance? Or are they
far from each other?
Regards
Haipeng
___
lilypond-us
