Hello LilyPond users,
I've created a chroot jail for LilyPond 2.18.2 on Ubuntu 12.04.4 LTS which I
installed by executing the binary
lilypond-2.18.2-1.linux-64.sh. I have followed the instructions the
instructions on
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/usage/command_002dline-usage#l
Hello LilyPond users,
I’ve created a chroot jail for LilyPond 2.18.2 on Ubuntu 12.04.4 LTS which I
installed by executing the binary
lilypond-2.18.2-1.linux-64.sh. I have followed the instructions the
instructions on
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/usage/command_002dline-usage#lily
Yup. I don't know enough about using a Terminal program or anything
else to get LilyPond to run without using the GUI. I need the GUI and
that's what doesn't work.
RDL
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailma
On Dec 17, 2009, at 12:10 PM, Robert Ley wrote:
The hard disc format is determined by the type of processor you
have in the machine: GUID format for Intel chips, MacOS Extended
for PPC chips. I have a G4 [PPC] chip, so both Ext. and Int. are
formatted with MacOS Extended.
The EXTERNAL has
The hard disc format is determined by the type of processor you have
in the machine: GUID format for Intel chips, MacOS Extended for PPC
chips. I have a G4 [PPC] chip, so both Ext. and Int. are formatted
with MacOS Extended.
The EXTERNAL has a different system, 10.4.11, under which LilyPond
I noticed in the digest someone talking about Lilypond for Mac working on an
external disk but not on the internal one - it is possible that they are
formatted differently. The Mac offers various filesystems, some of which are
case insensitive and some which are not! It may be informative to check
sdfgsdhdshd wrote:
>
> 6 warnings.
> Any conclusion?
>
no - I don't speak this language but I just thought an expert might find
something interesting in it...
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Lilypond-not-working%2C-XP-tp18253484p18260168.html
/www.nabble.com/file/p18256002/test.txt test.txt
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Lilypond-not-working%2C-XP-tp18253484p18257940.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-us
ntext:
http://www.nabble.com/Lilypond-not-working%2C-XP-tp18253484p18256002.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
t versions?
>
> Thanks
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Lilypond-not-working%2C-XP-tp18253484p18254190.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
.
I've tried it out and it works with 2.10.33, but is there any particular
reason that it wouldn't work with the two development versions?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Lilypond-not-working%2C-XP-tp18253484p18253484.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User ma
Quoting prince mathew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Dear Sir,
This is a mailing list read by lots of helpful users of LilyPond.
i download lilypond for windows and installed in my pc.
But when double clicking the icon it tells elow message.
i save that file in desktop and drag it to the icon of lilyp
Dear Sir,
i download lilypond for windows and installed in my pc.
But when double clicking the icon it tells elow message.
i save that file in desktop and drag it to the icon of lilypond, and a pdf
file got. i double clicked again in the lilypond icon, and doing the same.
nothing happened.
i nee
Rerun setup.exe and select the previous tetex version (2.0.x-y)
Bert
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
I think I followed the instructions in
http://lilypond.org/web/install/windows.html correctly, but Lilypond
outputs an empty pdf.
For installation I used the "Download Without Installing" option, and
then ran Setup again and used the "Install from Local Directory" option.
Here's the test.log:
--
At MIT, we have a bunch of centrally maintained redhat machines. As
far as I can tell, the central system decided to install guile1.3. It
removed my guile1.4, and put in a 1.3. When I removed it and
reinstalled 1.4, everything worked again. Thanks for all your
suggestions.
rif
_
16 matches
Mail list logo