Re: layout-set-staff-size units

2007-01-04 Thread Graham Percival
Mats Bengtsson wrote: - The text that I recently added to the manual is wrong, since it doesn't include the (* ... pt) to get the correct scaling. However, it seems more reasonable to change the function itself to use pt as the scale (the function is called internally at some places, which wou

Re: layout-set-staff-size units

2007-01-02 Thread Mats Bengtsson
I must have dreamt that I tried it. Anyway, it seems that the unit of the argument is not the same as for global-set-staff-size. If you try #(layout-set-staff-size (* 14.0 pt)) you will get the correct size. Still, the staff line spacing isn't adjusted as long as the function is called within a \l

Re: layout-set-staff-size units

2007-01-01 Thread gnomino
Mats Bengtsson wrote: > It did work last time I tried it. Could you please include > a small example that illustrates what you tried. The following does not work (everything except for lines are too big): \score { \relative c'' { \clef treble \key c \major

Re: layout-set-staff-size units

2007-01-01 Thread Mats Bengtsson
It did work last time I tried it. Could you please include a small example that illustrates what you tried. /Mats gnomino wrote: Hello, What are the units of #(layout-set-staff-size)? The documentation (11.2.1) suggests that the units are points, like #(set-global-staff-size), but the resul

layout-set-staff-size units

2006-12-28 Thread gnomino
Hello, What are the units of #(layout-set-staff-size)? The documentation (11.2.1) suggests that the units are points, like #(set-global-staff-size), but the results are that note heads end up being more than twice as big. Also, putting the command in a \layout block (as in the doc example) doesn'