Re: Newbie install question

Dear Mark, Il giorno ven 31 gen 2020 alle ore 13:11 Mark Gould ha scritto: > unable to revert mtime: /Library/Fonts > unable to revert mtime: /Library/Fonts/Microsoft does it persist if you run LilyPond again? See https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2020-01/msg00188.html Best wis

Re: Newbie install question

Hi Davide Thanks for this. I get a bit further now, but run into unable to revert mtime: /Library/Fonts unable to revert mtime: /Library/Fonts/Microsoft This one makes no sense to me sadly... Regards Mark On 30 Jan 2020, at 22:08, Davide Liessi wrote: Dear Mark, Il giorno gio 30 gen 2020

Re: Newbie install question

Dear Mark, Il giorno gio 30 gen 2020 alle ore 17:53 Mark Gould ha scritto: > /Applications/LilyPond 2.app/Contents/Resources/bin/lilypond: line 22: > /Applications//../libexec/lilypond-bin: No such file or directory > /Applications/LilyPond 2.app/Contents/Resources/bin/lilypond: line 22: exec:

Newbie install question

Hi, I’m using the unstable version that has been converted for use with MAC OS Catalina. I’m getting /Applications/LilyPond 2.app/Contents/Resources/bin/lilypond: line 22: /Applications//../libexec/lilypond-bin: No such file or directory /Applications/LilyPond 2.app/Contents/Resources/bin/lil

Re: install question

Federico Bruni writes: > I suggest installing the lilypond.org package in a different path from > that used by the distribution. In the future you might want to use the > updated distro package and have two versions installed.. > If you install as root user it will be installed in /usr/local: > >

Re: install question

I suggest installing the lilypond.org package in a different path from that used by the distribution. In the future you might want to use the updated distro package and have two versions installed.. If you install as root user it will be installed in /usr/local: sudo sh lilypond-version.sh sh lil

install question

I've noticed that I don't have the most recent stable version of Lilypond, and would like to install 2.18.2 to see if some issues I'm having are resolved. The instructions on lilypond.org suggest installing with: sh lilypond-2.18.2-1.linux-64.sh When I type this, though, I'm told, You are about

New Version Install -- Question

Hi! I posted this morning my delight at being able to install the latest version. It works fantastic. However, I have a question: Whereas in previous versions, we had to use convert-ly to update the syntax in our files, I tried using that this morning, and it used my older version (2.7.20)

Re: New Version Install -- Question

On 3-Feb-06, at 6:55 PM, Gordon Gilbert wrote: Whereas in previous versions, we had to use convert-ly to update the syntax in our files, I tried using that this morning, and it used my older version (2.7.20), so now, is that unnecessary? Can we simply compile some of our older files and have

Re: simple install question perhaps?

On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 11:52:23 -0500 Josh wrote: > My lilypad installation seems to have went well, went with the > binary (stable) v.2.2.5 for Mac OSX 10.3.6, hope that's > correct. got various confirmations in the FINK commander: > > @@@ > @@@ Installation Complete. > @@@ > @@@ Start a NEW shell

Re: simple install question perhaps?

Title: Re: simple install question perhaps? On 12/19/04 10:52 AM, "Josh Roseman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Greetings! Quick newbie-install question, any input would be greatly appreciated: My lilypad installation seems to have went well, went with the binary (stable) v.2

simple install question perhaps?

Greetings! Quick newbie-install question, any input would be greatly appreciated: My lilypad installation seems to have went well, went with the binary (stable) v.2.2.5 for Mac OSX 10.3.6, hope that's correct. got various confirmations in the FINK commander: @@@ @@@ Installation Com