Don't fully see what you intend.
But yes, you can do that, both from shell and Python scripts.
If your script is executable you can call it like any other shell command or
program.
HTH
Urs
Am 17. November 2014 08:35:38 MEZ, schrieb Stefan Thomas
:
>Dear community,
>thanks to You, especially to
Dear community,
thanks to You, especially to Urs and Ed.
Both, the bash- and the python-script work very well and do their job.
I would like to ask one last question:
Can I execute also a script in my folder ~/bin/ , can I run a script in a
script?
___
li
> Also, I don't understand the need for the -o option when you are using
> the default name. Which would boil down to:
The -o option was because the output file should go in the same folder
as the ly file and not in the present directory.
Joram
___
li
>
> Or even shorter, if slightly more arcane:
find . -name '*ly' -exec sh -c 'ly={}; lilypond -o "${ly%.ly}" "$ly"' \;
You might want to put the dot in your -name argument so you don't match
.ily files.
Also, I don't understand the need for the -o option when you are using the
default name. W
you may want to add the option delete-intermediate-files.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/how-to-compile-all-ly-files-including-subfolders-tp168692p168722.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
On 14 November 2014 14:11, Ed Gordijn wrote:
> Hi Urs,
>
> I'm not sure I do agree with your statement:
>
>> You can surely do what you want with a pure shell script, but Python may
>> be cleaner to read
>
> The 'pure shell' script looks like this:
>
> #!/bin/bash
>
> shopt -s globstar
Hello Ed,
I’d say that both the bash and Python scripts proposed are clean, the question
is more whether they are clear for newcomers to scripting.
So yes, there’s a learning curve there.
Enjoy!
JM
> Le 14 nov. 2014 à 14:11:46, Ed Gordijn a écrit :
>
> Hi Urs,
>
> I'm not sure I do agree wi
Hi Urs,
I'm not sure I do agree with your statement:
> You can surely do what you want with a pure shell script, but Python
may be cleaner to read
The 'pure shell' script looks like this:
#!/bin/bash
shopt -s globstar # to be able to use ** for sub-dirs
for lyFile in **/*.
Take the attachment as an inspiration - but without any warranty.
Too late to do it right, no time either.
It seems to work but hasn't been really tested.
The script has to be somewhere in the PATH (e.g. in ~/bin) and takes the
directory from which it is called as the root to be searched.
cd
Dear Urs,
Yes, a python script would be fine.
Is a Python script an option?
>
> You can surely do what you want with a pure shell script, but Python may
> be cleaner to read?
>
> Best
> Urs
>
> Am 13.11.2014 22:06, schrieb Stefan Thomas:
>
Dear Nick,
thanks for Your reply.
But Your command wri
Is a Python script an option?
You can surely do what you want with a pure shell script, but Python may
be cleaner to read?
Best
Urs
Am 13.11.2014 22:06, schrieb Stefan Thomas:
Dear Nick,
thanks for Your reply.
But Your command writes the pdf-files to the folder, where it's executed.
I want t
Dear Nick,
thanks for Your reply.
But Your command writes the pdf-files to the folder, where it's executed.
I want the pdf-files in the same folder as the ly-files.
On 14/11/2014 06:39, Stefan Thomas wrote:
>
> Dear community,
>
> I would like to compile (on a Ubuntu-machine) all ly-files, includ
On 14/11/2014 06:39, Stefan Thomas wrote:
Dear community,
I would like to compile (on a Ubuntu-machine) all ly-files, including
those, which are in subfolders.
How can I do this?
cd to the parent folder, and issue the following command:
find . -name '*.ly' -exec lilypond {} \;
_
Dear community,
I would like to compile (on a Ubuntu-machine) all ly-files, including
those, which are in subfolders.
How can I do this?
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
14 matches
Mail list logo
