bart deruyter writes:
> It's strange to say, but lilypond is so good that most often scheme is
> not needed, which makes the actual use of scheme rare (for me at
> least), which in turn does not let me train it :-) .
That is sort of an intentional consequence of a lot of post 2.12 work.
There is
Hey,
thanks for the help and I think I understand the explanation about Lisp.
I thought it would be something like this though, the error message made me
think that scheme wasn't able to read the variable, I only did not know
why, now I do :-) .
Another problem for me is having usecases to lear
bart deruyter writes:
> #(define-markup-command (scale-diagramm layout props arg1 arg2 start arg3
> arg4) (list? integer? integer? number? integer?)
>
> (interpret-markup layout props
>
> (markup
>
> (#:override (cons 'size arg3 )
>
> (#:override '(fret-diagram-details
>
>> > The snippet for the scale diagram assumes that the lowest sounding note
>> is
>> > the root of the scale. What if it isn't the case?
>> > I'd like to change the root to for example the second note in the list,
>> or
>> > the thi
unding note
> is
> > the root of the scale. What if it isn't the case?
> > I'd like to change the root to for example the second note in the list,
> or
> > the third, whichever I'd need as root.
> >
> > Can this be achieved by adding someth
; I'd like to change the root to for example the second note in the list, or
> the third, whichever I'd need as root.
>
> Can this be achieved by adding something to the snippet?
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/guitar-scale-diagram-
Hi all,
I'm assembling a list of scales for my students. with scale diagrams. I've
successfully implementend : http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=790 . But
now I stumble on another problem.
The snippet for the scale diagram assumes that the lowest sounding note is
the root of the scale. What if i
