Re: grace synchronization

2011-08-26 Thread David Kastrup
Reinhold Kainhofer writes: > On Fr., 26. Aug. 2011 23:32:39 CEST, David Kastrup wrote: > >> I checked around, and Rationals (which are used for time) have a >> representation of -inf.  I think it would be a good start if the default >> grace time component (namely when no grace is present) was

Re: grace synchronization

2011-08-26 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
Am Friday, 26. August 2011, 23:05:26 schrieb Kieren MacMillan: > Well, here's an curious discovery: If you have a global variable > "simultaneous-ed" into the Voice/Staff context(s), the "extra" skipped > grace note MUST BE IN THE GLOBAL, not just explicitly placed in the other > Voice(s)/Staff(s).

Re: grace synchronization

2011-08-26 Thread Hans Aberg
On 27 Aug 2011, at 00:51, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > On Fr., 26. Aug. 2011 23:32:39 CEST, David Kastrup wrote: > >> I checked around, and Rationals (which are used for time) have a >> representation of -inf. I think it would be a good start if the default >> grace time component (namely when

Re: grace synchronization

2011-08-26 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
Am Friday, 26. August 2011, 22:59:47 schrieb Hans Aberg: > My impression is that there is a mixture of code, sometimes putting the > grace-note before the bar, and sometimes after. > > A fix might allow one to fine-tune that. Actually, lilypond's handling is way more abstract. There are no checks

Re: grace synchronization

2011-08-26 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
On Fr., 26. Aug. 2011 23:32:39 CEST, David Kastrup wrote: > I checked around, and Rationals (which are used for time) have a > representation of -inf.  I think it would be a good start if the default > grace time component (namely when no grace is present) was not set to 0, > but to -inf, meanin

Re: grace synchronization

2011-08-26 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi all, Well, here's an curious discovery: If you have a global variable "simultaneous-ed" into the Voice/Staff context(s), the "extra" skipped grace note MUST BE IN THE GLOBAL, not just explicitly placed in the other Voice(s)/Staff(s). \version "2.13" % skip in voice = fail global = { \key a

Re: grace synchronization

2011-08-26 Thread Hans Aberg
On 26 Aug 2011, at 22:47, Kieren MacMillan wrote: >> I now got it working: just put in a grace note with a skip in the other >> staff. > > I had already tried that in my score — doesn't fix the problem. To fix the problem, I first commented out the other staff (in fact, some chord names). When

Re: grace synchronization

2011-08-26 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Hans, > I now got it working: just put in a grace note with a skip in the other staff. I had already tried that in my score — doesn't fix the problem. > However, when trying to use \bar ":||", like in the manual, then all sorts of > strange things happen. =( Kieren.

Re: grace synchronization

2011-08-26 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
Wow, this still isn't fixed? I'll put money towards this, too. -Jonathan - Original Message - > From: Kieren MacMillan > To: Lilypond-User Mailing List > Cc: Lilypond Bugreports > Sent: Friday, August 26, 2011 11:43 AM > Subject: grace synchronization

Re: grace synchronization

2011-08-26 Thread Hans Aberg
On 26 Aug 2011, at 21:30, Hans Aberg wrote: > On 26 Aug 2011, at 17:43, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > >> I'm running into a rather irritating grace synchronization problem — an >> acciaccatura in one voice is overriding an explicit page break — and so I >> wanted to k

Re: grace synchronization

2011-08-26 Thread Hans Aberg
On 26 Aug 2011, at 17:43, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > I'm running into a rather irritating grace synchronization problem — an > acciaccatura in one voice is overriding an explicit page break — and so I > wanted to know what it would take to fix the grace sync problem "once a

grace synchronization

2011-08-26 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hello all, I'm running into a rather irritating grace synchronization problem — an acciaccatura in one voice is overriding an explicit page break — and so I wanted to know what it would take to fix the grace sync problem "once and for all". I know of Issue 34 (and others) in t

Re: Issue 34: Grace synchronization

2007-11-11 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Of course, most LilyPond users and hackers agree that this is a major issue. The problem is that solving it will require lots of hacking, as far as I can understand. /Mats Peter Mogensen wrote: Hi, Am I the only one who is sad to see Issue 34 at low priority? I guess it's about the bug ment

Issue 34: Grace synchronization

2007-11-11 Thread Peter Mogensen
Hi, Am I the only one who is sad to see Issue 34 at low priority? I guess it's about the bug mentioned at the bottom of: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.10/Documentation/user/lilypond/Grace-notes I write a lot of scores with drum flams (*) and this bug makes it a lot harder to write and maintain.