Matthias Kilian wrote:
>
> I don't think it's the `-q' that causes the failure, because this
> flag only makes ghostscript quiet
And it is not the -q flag as I just ran the command with it.
It is as you say suggest, lilypond is bombing when trying to run
the ghostscript command. But why?
> My b
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 05:54:24PM -0500, Ivan Kuznetsov wrote:
> > Could you try
> > to run ghostscript manually to convert it to pdf (but omit the `-q'
> > flag)? Like, just run
> >
> > gs -dSAFER -dDEVICEWIDTHPOINTS=612.00 -dDEVICEHEIGHTPOINTS=792.00 \
> >-dCompatibilityLevel=1.4 -dNOPAU
Matthias Kilian wrote:
>
> Could you try
> to run ghostscript manually to convert it to pdf (but omit the `-q'
> flag)? Like, just run
>
> gs -dSAFER -dDEVICEWIDTHPOINTS=612.00 -dDEVICEHEIGHTPOINTS=792.00 \
>-dCompatibilityLevel=1.4 -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -r1200 \
>-sDEVICE=pdfwrite -sO
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 03:59:17PM -0500, ivan.k.kuznet...@gmail.com wrote:
> I ran the CentOS recommended updates and I updated from
> ghostscript-8.15.2-9.12 to ghostscript-8.70-6.
>
> Since that time, lilypond no longer works for me in that
> lilypond .ps files but no longer produces .pdf
I am using lilypond 2.12.3 under CentOS 5.6. Recently,
I ran the CentOS recommended updates and I updated from
ghostscript-8.15.2-9.12 to ghostscript-8.70-6.
Since that time, lilypond no longer works for me in that
lilypond .ps files but no longer produces .pdf files.
Here is what the output at
