Right now Lilypond moves it so far away that it is unclear to the musician
reading. I need the explicit accidentals because many of the pieces have
no barlines, and clear is more important to me than pretty.
In your example the first tie(modified) is better notation than the
second(default) for s
Any better?
\version "2.19.26"
{
\clef bass
\override Tie.details = #'((note-head-gap . 0))
cis1~ cis!1~ cis!1
dis! ~ dis!
fis! ~ fis!
bes! ~ bes!
}
Andrew
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/
Hi Robert,
Well I am cringing.
But does this come closer to what you are after?
\version "2.19.26"
{
\clef bass
\once \override Tie.staff-position = #-2
cis1~ cis!1~ cis!1
}
You don’t really want the tie to cross the accidental, do you?
Andrew
On 3/09/2015 12:40,
Let's say I have something like:
{
\clef bass
cis1~ cis!1~ cis!1
}
I want all the accidentals to appear and I do not want the tie to be moved
really far away like it is now. I preferred a few versions ago when it
would go right through the accidental.
I realize this is arguably crude and will m
