Re: function for Glissando with length stopped working

2013-07-25 Thread MarcM
thanks a lot David and all. -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/function-for-Glissando-with-length-stopped-working-tp148399p148431.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user

Re: function for Glissando with length stopped working

2013-07-25 Thread David Kastrup
MarcM writes: > David the new syntax looks great. Is there a way to have the minimum-length > taken into account? > > Where can i find more info about upgrading the old syntax to 2.17? Well, the "Extending LilyPond" guide is still relevant and it is probably what whoever created the original cod

Re: function for Glissando with length stopped working

2013-07-25 Thread MarcM
ote: >>> MarcM < > marc@ > > writes: >>> >>>> I'm using nabble to post to lilypond and i had added the lilypond code. >>>> Are >>>> you not seeing it? >>>> http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/function-for-Glissa

Re: function for Glissando with length stopped working

2013-07-25 Thread James Harkins
MarcM mouries.net> writes: > I'm using nabble to post to lilypond and i had added the lilypond code. Are > you not seeing it? Nabble has a really horrible, careless, stupid bug where it omits everything inside CODE tags from the mails it sends to the list. I've seen this on the SuperCollider m

Re: function for Glissando with length stopped working

2013-07-25 Thread David Kastrup
Nick Payne writes: > On 25/07/13 21:32, David Kastrup wrote: >> MarcM writes: >> >>> I'm using nabble to post to lilypond and i had added the lilypond code. Are >>> you not seeing it? >>> http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/function-for-Glissa

Re: function for Glissando with length stopped working

2013-07-25 Thread Nick Payne
On 25/07/13 21:32, David Kastrup wrote: MarcM writes: I'm using nabble to post to lilypond and i had added the lilypond code. Are you not seeing it? http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/function-for-Glissando-with-length-stopped-working-tp148399p148402.html "Nabble" is not

Re: function for Glissando with length stopped working

2013-07-25 Thread David Kastrup
MarcM writes: > I'm using nabble to post to lilypond and i had added the lilypond code. Are > you not seeing it? > http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/function-for-Glissando-with-length-stopped-working-tp148399p148402.html "Nabble" is not the list server. The off

Re: function for Glissando with length stopped working

2013-07-25 Thread Matthias Böhringer
ng it? http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/function-for-Glissando-with-length-stopped-working-tp148399p148402.html -- Matthias Böhringer Brunnenstraße 6 72296 Schopfloch-Unteriflingen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gn

Re: function for Glissando with length stopped working

2013-07-25 Thread MarcM
I'm using nabble to post to lilypond and i had added the lilypond code. Are you not seeing it? http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/function-for-Glissando-with-length-stopped-working-tp148399p148402.html -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/functio

Re: function for Glissando with length stopped working

2013-07-24 Thread David Kastrup
MarcM writes: > I had a function that generates a glissando with a specific length that > stopped working. > I believe it worked in 2.14 > i am now using 2.17.2 You are not exactly giving us much to work with here. At any rate: have you tried running convert-ly on your code? -- David Kastrup

function for Glissando with length stopped working

2013-07-24 Thread MarcM
I had a function that generates a glissando with a specific length that stopped working. I believe it worked in 2.14 i am now using 2.17.2 -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/function-for-Glissando-with-length-stopped-working-tp148399.html Sent from the