Re: fingerings inside the staff

2016-11-07 Thread Gianmaria Lari
Thank you for the override and tweak Pierre! Simon, my following question is just a curiosity to understand better how Lilypond works and the philosophy of this tool. Is for historical reason that there are two different engravers (Regarding Fingering_engraver and New_fingering_engraver)? Could it

Re: fingerings inside the staff

2016-11-06 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
Or tweak it: { %\override Fingering.staff-padding = #'() c'-\tweak staff-padding #'()-1 } Pierre 2016-11-07 7:49 GMT+01:00 Pierre Perol-Schneider < pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com>: > Hi Gianmaria, > > You can also override the staff padding: > > { > \override Fingering.staff-padding = #

Re: fingerings inside the staff

2016-11-06 Thread Pierre Perol-Schneider
Hi Gianmaria, You can also override the staff padding: { \override Fingering.staff-padding = #'() c'-1 } Cheers, Pierre 2016-11-07 1:08 GMT+01:00 Simon Albrecht : > On 07.11.2016 00:17, Gianmaria Lari wrote: > >> In the manual is written: >> >> By default, vertically oriented fingering

Re: fingerings inside the staff

2016-11-06 Thread Simon Albrecht
On 07.11.2016 00:17, Gianmaria Lari wrote: In the manual is written: By default, vertically oriented fingerings are positioned outside the staff. However, this behavior can be canceled. Note: you must use a chord construct <>, even if it is only a single note. Why to obtain this be

fingerings inside the staff

2016-11-06 Thread Gianmaria Lari
In the manual is written: By default, vertically oriented fingerings are positioned outside the staff. However, this behavior can be canceled. Note: you must use a chord construct <>, even if it is only a single note. Why to obtain this behavior the chord construct is mandatory? g. _