Re: fermata position (was: Re: Two Problems with a SATB-Choir Score)

2002-11-05 Thread Ronald Hoellwarth
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 09:18:43PM -0800, Graham Percival wrote: > On Sat, 02 Nov 2002 08:55:21 +0100 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ronald Hoellwarth) wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 03:29:19PM -0800, Graham Percival wrote: > > > On Fri, 01 Nov 2002 23:03:13 +0100 > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ronald Hoellwar

Re: fermata position (was: Re: Two Problems with a SATB-Choir Score)

2002-11-04 Thread Graham Percival
On Sat, 02 Nov 2002 08:55:21 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ronald Hoellwarth) wrote: > On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 03:29:19PM -0800, Graham Percival wrote: > > On Fri, 01 Nov 2002 23:03:13 +0100 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ronald Hoellwarth) wrote: > > > But: why did v1.4.12 choose to put the fermata on the bass

fermata position (was: Re: Two Problems with a SATB-Choir Score)

2002-11-02 Thread Ronald Hoellwarth
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 03:29:19PM -0800, Graham Percival wrote: > On Fri, 01 Nov 2002 23:03:13 +0100 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ronald Hoellwarth) wrote: > > But: why did v1.4.12 choose to put the fermata on the bass part correctly > > under the note but v1.6.5 choose (wrongy) to put the fermata above t