2008/10/6 Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> OK, I added it (my first, so please check it out
> and fix it up if necessary). I'd like to ref it
> in the docs.
Hi Trevor,
which one is it?
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=516
or
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=517
?
(PS you may obtain
Valentin Villenave wrote Monday, October 06, 2008 12:16 PM
2008/10/5 Mark Polesky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Patrick McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wow, Mark, that is really cool! This should be added to the LSR.
Would you like me to add it?
Sure! But here's
2008/10/6 Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Can't normal users tag stuff with "docs"? Your or Neil would
> still need to Approve it, but surely you still want normal users
> to indicate whether they think it should be included in the docs
> or not.
Yes, I meant "Approve".
That being said, w
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 13:16:49 +0200
"Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/10/5 Mark Polesky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Patrick McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >> Wow, Mark, that is really cool! This should be added to the LSR.
> >> Would you l
2008/10/5 Mark Polesky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Patrick McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Wow, Mark, that is really cool! This should be added to the LSR.
>> Would you like me to add it?
>
> Sure! But here's a slightly different version that demonstrates the
> con
2008/10/5 Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I was just about to propose the following alternative solution,
> which only uses features that are actually described in the
> manual (more or less well hidden, though). However, then I
> noticed that it didn't give exactly the same output. First of
I was just about to propose the following alternative solution,
which only uses features that are actually described in the
manual (more or less well hidden, though). However, then I
noticed that it didn't give exactly the same output. First of all,
it gives squares that are centered below the ste
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Patrick McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow, Mark, that is really cool! This should be added to the LSR.
> Would you like me to add it?
Sure! But here's a slightly different version that demonstrates the
concept a little better (I think).
Of course, feel free
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 9:44 PM, Mark Polesky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ha! I figured it out...
> - Mark
>
> ---
>
> \version "2.11.61-1"
>
> squareNoteHeads = {
> \override Voice.NoteHead #'stencil =
> #(ly:make-stencil
> (list 'embedded-ps
> "gsave
> curre
Ha! I figured it out...
- Mark
---
\version "2.11.61-1"
squareNoteHeads = {
\override Voice.NoteHead #'stencil =
#(ly:make-stencil
(list 'embedded-ps
"gsave
currentpoint translate
BeginEPSF
%%BeginDocument:
newpath
-0.5 -0.5 moveto
-0.5 0.5 lineto
0.5
Hi.
I'd like to make my own stencils using PostScript
commands, but the documentation on this topic isn't
quite there yet, I guess. I don't understand how
the "string" passed to 'embedded-ps is supposed to
be formatted.
I'm using the ps backend, and the relevant lines in
/scm/output-ps.scm (line
11 matches
Mail list logo
