On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 14:47:59 -0700 (PDT)
eluze wrote:
>
> Tiresia Giuno wrote
> >
> >
> > I avoid using the Dynamics Context, because it places dynamics far
> > away from the staff (even if with LP 2.15 it looks much better)-
> > and hairpins are still slightly misaligned, see attached file
chestral staves to look the same you have to use the
same approach for all of them!
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/dynamics-and-hairpins-attached-to-rests-vs-dynamics-attached-to-notes-tp130716p130729.html
Sent
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 07:03:06 -0700 (PDT)
eluze wrote:
>
> Tiresia Giuno wrote
> >
> >
> >
> > The attached examples are quite simple, in my score with more
> > complex music, such behavior leads to quite strange situations.
> >
> > Am I right and if so, which would be the easiest solution?
>
On 16 August 2012 14:59, Tiresia GIUNO wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed that in LP 2.14.2, dynamics and hairpins attached to rests
> (r or s) are slightly out of alignment when compared to dynamics and
> hairpins attached to notes.
Could you check with latest development version?
Several issues co
way you can reuse the same voice/staff with the dynamics in it (of
course you can also use a separate voice with spacers for the dynamics…)
hth
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/dynamics-and-hairpins-attached-to-rests-vs-dynamics-attached-to-notes-tp1
Hi all,
I noticed that in LP 2.14.2, dynamics and hairpins attached to rests
(r or s) are slightly out of alignment when compared to dynamics and
hairpins attached to notes.
See attached ex. A
%% EXAMPLE A %%
musicOne = { a'4\< ~ a'\ ~ a'\> r4\! }
dynamics = { r4\< r\ r\> r\! }
