>\layout { \context { \Score \omit DynamicText } }
>in a shorter way
And nicer looking (as in easier to understand to the average person) --
thanks!
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Pierre Perol-Schneider <
pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2014-09-04 18:31 GMT+02:00 David Bel
Hi,
2014-09-04 18:31 GMT+02:00 David Bellows :
> >\layout { \context { \Score \override DynamicText.stencil = ##f } }
>
> Perfect! And thank you! (Now to figure out how to squeeze that sucker in
> there...)
>
\layout { \context { \Score \omit DynamicText } }
in a shorter way
Cheers,
Pierre
___
>\layout { \context { \Score \override DynamicText.stencil = ##f } }
Perfect! And thank you! (Now to figure out how to squeeze that sucker in
there...)
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Kieren MacMillan <
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> > So what I'm looking for is that one
Hi David,
> So what I'm looking for is that one magical command that will just not print
> any dynamic marking that is in the Lilypond file.
\layout { \context { \Score \override DynamicText.stencil = ##f } }
should work.
Hope this helps!
Kieren.
___
Kieren MacMillan, com
. For some
algorithms I would like to automatically remove all the dynamic markings
but I cannot (without a major code rewrite) just remove them from the score
that is generated.
So what I'm looking for is that one magical command that will just not
print any dynamic marking that is in the Lilypon
I recommend you to read carefully the full chapter on "Tweaking output".
The section "Fixing overlapping notation" contains a list of commonly
tweaked objects. The general principles for how to figure out the relevant
object are discribed in the section "The \override command" with its
subsection.
Hello,I have one last question concerning colouring objects,what is the correct syntax to colour an absolute dynamic marking?Something like:\override Dynamic.Marking #'color = #red ?I have trouble finding the correct context and object names to use, but i think I have at least learned how to add an
ts
Christopher A. LaFond wrote:
Is there anyway to use different dynamic markings for different verses
of a choral piece?
For example, if verses 1 & 3 are to be forte, while 2 is to be mezzo
forte (in all voices), is there a way of marking this. The easiest
thing would be to be able to put t
Is there anyway to use different dynamic markings for different verses
of a choral piece?
For example, if verses 1 & 3 are to be forte, while 2 is to be mezzo
forte (in all voices), is there a way of marking this. The easiest thing
would be to be able to put the markings before the numbe
On 28-Mar-06, at 11:01 PM, Geoff Horton wrote:
You're missing an update to the docs that got submitted just after
2.8.0 was released. :)
Some situations (such as dynamic marks) have preset font-related
properties. If you are creating text in such situations, it
is advisable to cancel th
> You're missing an update to the docs that got submitted just after
> 2.8.0 was released. :)
>
>
> Some situations (such as dynamic marks) have preset font-related
> properties. If you are creating text in such situations, it
> is advisable to cancel those properties with
> @code{normal-tex
On 28-Mar-06, at 6:14 PM, Geoff Horton wrote:
I found a post on the list which suggests using the staff-padding
parameter to put all dynamic markings on the same baseline. But it
didn't say, and I can't figure out, how to actually make that happen.
Based on the manual, this paramet
I found a post on the list which suggests using the staff-padding
parameter to put all dynamic markings on the same baseline. But it
didn't say, and I can't figure out, how to actually make that happen.
Based on the manual, this parameter belongs to TextSpanner, which
lives in Voice, s
13 matches
Mail list logo
