Re: documentation request (or feature request) w.r.t. polyphony

2008-10-29 Thread Trevor Daniels
Kieren MacMillan wrote Wednesday, October 29, 2008 1:16 PM To be honest, I'm getting a little tired of answering questions about "bugs" in Lilypond that are really just issues related to implicitly- instantiated voices, i.e., the << {} \\ {} >> construct. Even writing (or seeing others write) "

Re: documentation request (or feature request) w.r.t. polyphony

2008-10-29 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Kieren MacMillan wrote: Better yet, why can't the shorthand automatically "do the right thing"? i.e., << {} \\ {} >> should be translated automagically into << {} \new Voice {} >> That way, the *only* time anyone has to do any tweaking is when they *want* two brand new voices — whic

documentation request (or feature request) w.r.t. polyphony

2008-10-29 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hey all, To be honest, I'm getting a little tired of answering questions about "bugs" in Lilypond that are really just issues related to implicitly- instantiated voices, i.e., the << {} \\ {} >> construct. Even writing (or seeing others write) "look at the docs on explicitly instantiating vo