> - \repeat unfold 64 { \skip 4 }
Thank you, Francisco. Typing \repeat unfold 4 { \skip 4 } is just fine
and it looks like it will work for my actual song as well.
Thanks to Phil holmes I now know why it does not matter what value I
write behind \skip in lyricmode. It alignes every time. However
2010/6/26 Sven Siegmund :
> \alternative { { b d } { b a } }
Here, if you write
\alternative { { b d \break } { b a } }
you'll see that the 'differ' part tries to be aligned with the other
lyrics. Just it doesn't in your example because it has not room enough
to fit.
> Currently, becaus
Hello,
I am glad that I have found a conversation about different lyrics for
repetition and alternatives in the Lilypond mailing list archive.
I have just installed Lilypond, worked through the introduction and am
trying to write a song where I need a more sophisticated solution for
writing lyrics
2009/7/17 胡海鹏 - Hu Haipeng :
> Thank you for your replies. Then, is this good? I still use voice
> association, because I'll use ignoreMelismata in the second stanza in the
> actual song, and I don't want to generate more weird things.
Yes, and that scheme of simple voice association to a freshly
Thank you for your replies. Then, is this good? I still use voice association,
because I'll use ignoreMelismata in the second stanza in the actual song, and I
don't want to generate more weird things.
Regards
Haipeng
\version "2.13.3"
music = \relative c' {
\clef treble \time 4/4
2009/7/17 Francisco Vila :
> Then add a second line for the repeated fragment.
If the lyrics for the repeated fragment is common to both voltas,
simply omit this second addlyrics. You end with a single line of
lyrics, correctly aligned with the noteheads just as whether no
repeats existed.
The pr
On second thought, this new approach that uses only addlyrics is the
best. Simply put a line of lyrics that contains 1st stanza plus 1st
alternative, plus 2nd alternative, plus the rest. Then add a second
line for the repeated fragment. I think comments explain all, ask
again if not.
\relative c'
Thank you. Then, must I define another new voice in the second alternative? How
to simplify this?
Regards
Haipeng
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hu,
You are very close to the solution!
Your \new Voice inside the alternative is an expression that gets the
value of the very next block surrounded by curly braces (and only the
first one). That's why the 'alt' lyrics does not fill the second
alternative.
Also, you obtain 'sol' vertically alig
Thank you. Then, is this ok? It can compile, but I don't know 1) whether the
lyrics are correctly aligned; and 2) whether the second and third new voices
change stems to weird directions.
Regards
Haipeng
\version "2.13.3"
music = \relative c' {
\clef treble \time 4/4
\repeat volta 2
Thank you for your advice. I ever read this in NR, but wasn't sure whether it
works. Now again the example. I don't know whether the variables are correct,
but it really can't work! The error is unexpected \alternative, perhaps because
I assigned it to another voice. How to hack on it?
Regards
This is expected when you mix the repeat structure with variables and
the top score structure. What I suggested is to open new voice blocks
without touching the top repeat structure. You don't really need
variables to do this, and I talked about voice names, not variable
names. More below.
2009/7/
2009/7/16 胡海鹏 - Hu Haipeng :
> So, how to correctly add these different two verses?
Try the following:
Split the music into named voice blocks, inside of the repeat structure.
\repeat ... {
\new Voice = "name" { }
}
then apply them your lyrics, a block a time, with lyricsto
<<
...
Hello,
I seldom deal with songs, and am hard to search the mailinglist (NR. leaves
this section empty!). So maybe this problem has been discussed before.
I'm writing a song with two verses most of the time. In the melody-only
version (I'll give it to my teacher), the melody is repeated with a
14 matches
Mail list logo
