2009/4/9 Martin Tarenskeen :
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 12:42:53AM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote:
>> 2009/4/8 Martin Tarenskeen :
>> >> Do you have git installed? It would be preferable to have a patch
>> >> created with git format-patch.
>
> I have attached such a patch.
>From 8cb3d025d08f08437f22c9a
2009/4/7 Martin Tarenskeen :
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 09:50:17AM +0200, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
>>
>> Patch attached for those who want to try.
>>
>
> I was wondering what the "experts" think of my suggested patches to
> change Lilypond's MID output behaviour:
>
> Current: default MIDI Note On ve
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 09:50:17AM +0200, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
>
> Patch attached for those who want to try.
>
I was wondering what the "experts" think of my suggested patches to
change Lilypond's MID output behaviour:
Current: default MIDI Note On velocity value of 127
Proposed: default M
On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 11:04:09PM +0200, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
> diff -ur lilypond-2.13.0.orig/lily/midi-item.cc
> lilypond-2.13.0/lily/midi-item.cc
> --- lilypond-2.13.0.orig/lily/midi-item.cc2009-04-05 21:11:25.0
> +0200
> +++ lilypond-2.13.0/lily/midi-item.cc 2009-04-05 21:17
On 4/5/09 2:42 PM, "Mats Bengtsson" wrote:
> Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> Yes, it's probably a good idea. In scm/midi.scm, there is the following:
>>
>> ;; 90 == 90/127 == 0.71 is supposed to be the default value
>> ;; urg: we should set this at start of track
>> (define-public dynamic-def
( My mail client is doing strange things ... this is another attempt to
send my message to the mailing list )
On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 08:05:17PM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> >> Anybody willing to take this on as a patch? It shouldn't be too
> >> hard, but I imagine it'll take some time grepp
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
Yes, it's probably a good idea. In scm/midi.scm, there is the following:
;; 90 == 90/127 == 0.71 is supposed to be the default value
;; urg: we should set this at start of track
(define-public dynamic-default-volume 0.71)
As far as I can see, this setting isn't use
On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 10:37:08PM +0200, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
> Just some thoughts about MIDI.
> Now let's make beautiful scores again using Lilypond.
> If you want a default velocity of 90 instead of 127: patch attached.
Ooops. I forgot to attach my patch.
--
Martin Tarenskeen
__
On 4/4/09 4:21 PM, "Neil Puttock" wrote:
> 2009/4/3 Carl D. Sorensen :
>
>> Anybody willing to take this on as a patch? It shouldn't be too hard, but I
>> imagine it'll take some time grepping through the source files.
>
> If we agree that it's just a case of changing the default velocity,
2009/4/3 Carl D. Sorensen :
> Anybody willing to take this on as a patch? It shouldn't be too hard, but I
> imagine it'll take some time grepping through the source files.
If we agree that it's just a case of changing the default velocity,
then this is ideally suited to a Frog; on the other hand
Martin Tarenskeen writes:
> Questions:
> 1. How can I change the default MIDI velocity from 127 to a more modest
> value, without adding dynamic marks in the printable score ?
How about this:
music = \relative c' {
c' d e f
}
\score {
\music
\layout{}
}
\s
On 2 Apr 2009, at 11:21, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
I think MIDI is underdeveloped in LilyPond, and part of the reason is
that it is not a suitable audio format.
(strictly speaking, I think MIDI is not an audio format.)
"Audio generation format" might be better.
I don't agree. For test-hear
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 10:43:10AM +0200, Hans Aberg wrote:
> On 2 Apr 2009, at 09:52, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
>
>> 1. How can I change the default MIDI velocity from 127 to a more
>> modest
>> value, without adding dynamic marks in the printable score ?
>>
>&g
On 2 Apr 2009, at 09:52, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
1. How can I change the default MIDI velocity from 127 to a more
modest
value, without adding dynamic marks in the printable score ?
2. Shouldn't it be a good idea to lower midi-velocity values for
lilypond's MIDI output by default
l, it just surprised me.
Questions:
1. How can I change the default MIDI velocity from 127 to a more modest
value, without adding dynamic marks in the printable score ?
2. Shouldn't it be a good idea to lower midi-velocity values for
lilypond's MIDI output by default ? In other words:
15 matches
Mail list logo
