Am Montag, den 21. Mai 2012 um 16:18:16 Uhr (+0200) schrieb Orm Finnendahl:
> The example for neo-modern in the documentation actually is an
> excellent example for a situation where the musician has to ask about
> the second fis because it's not obvious if the accidental has been
> accidentally fo
Am Montag, den 21. Mai 2012 um 15:58:14 Uhr (+0200) schrieb Jan Nieuwenhuizen:
> Question is: is neo-modern used and appreciated as it works right now
> and do we indeed need a "contemporary" style, or should neo-modern
> behave like Orm describes?
I would opt for that. The only situation, I know
Orm Finnendahl writes:
>> \accidentalStyle "neo-modern" does not match your requirements?
>
> its close, but the immediate repetition is the problem. I encounter
> calls by musicians quite often if I don't explicitely restate the
> accidental (even if it's stated in the foreword).
Question is: is
On 2012-05-21 13:09, Orm Finnendahl wrote:
My suggestion for the name of this style would be "contemporary"
That only works from our particular point of view. If someone runs
Lilypond sometime far into the distant future or in the distant past,
they wouldn't see it as contemporary. I'd suggest
Am Montag, den 21. Mai 2012 um 15:37:33 Uhr (+0200) schrieb David Kastrup:
>
> \accidentalStyle "neo-modern" does not match your requirements?
>
its close, but the immediate repetition is the problem. I encounter
calls by musicians quite often if I don't explicitely restate the
accidental (even
Orm Finnendahl writes:
> Hi,
>
> for years I'm sorely missing an accidental style for contemporary
> music, which I always use and which is quite common among contemporary
> composers in my experience. At the moment it requires quite some extra
> work in every score implementing the accidentals
Hi,
for years I'm sorely missing an accidental style for contemporary
music, which I always use and which is quite common among contemporary
composers in my experience. At the moment it requires quite some extra
work in every score implementing the accidentals explicitely although
its behaviour c
