Re: consolidate code

2014-02-11 Thread MING TSANG
Hi, David: Thank you for your patience and the modified solfege-engraver.  Now that you mention David Kastrup I remember reading his  presentation (long time ago) and copy his code and adapted for my use. Thanks for you help. Emmanuel, Ming. On Tuesday, February 11, 2014 8:25:53 PM, David Nale

Re: consolidate code

2014-02-11 Thread David Nalesnik
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:49 PM, MING TSANG wrote: > David, > Thank you very much. Now that I have a clean function instead of duplicate > code in the same file for minor difference - what a life-saver. > Emmanuel, > Ming. > Glad I could help! --David ___

Re: consolidate code

2014-02-11 Thread MING TSANG
David, Thank you very much. Now that I have a clean function instead of duplicate code in the same file for minor difference - what a life-saver. Emmanuel, Ming. On Tuesday, February 11, 2014 8:08:48 PM, David Nalesnik wrote: Hi Ming, On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 4:28 PM, MING TSANG wrote:

Re: consolidate code

2014-02-11 Thread David Nalesnik
Hi Ming, On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:13 PM, MING TSANG wrote: > > Hi, David: I cut & paste > http://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg73062.html > > but I got > > Not Found > The document you were looking for was not found. > Hmm. That's something I don't fully understand. I see the addres

Re: consolidate code

2014-02-11 Thread MING TSANG
>> >> - >Original Message - >> *From:* MING TSANG < >tsang94@ >> >> *To:* >-Eluze < >eluzew@ >> ; lilypond-user mailinglist< >lilypond-user@ >>> >> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 11, 2014 9:07 PM >>

Re: consolidate code

2014-02-11 Thread David Nalesnik
Hi Ming, On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 4:28 PM, MING TSANG wrote: > Hi all, > I further reduce the code to 53 lines. line 4 - 20 & line 24 - 40 are > identical except line 14 vs line 34. The actual code for notes is only 8 > lines ( 45 - 52). I think I cannot reduce anymore in order to show my

Re: consolidate code

2014-02-11 Thread Eluze
SANG < > tsang94@ > > >> *To:* -Eluze < > eluzew@ > > ; lilypond-user mailinglist< > lilypond-user@ > > >> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 11, 2014 9:07 PM >> *Subject:* Re: consolidate code >> >> *From*: Eluze *Subject*: Re: consolida

Re: consolidate code

2014-02-11 Thread MING TSANG
ypond-user mailinglist >>Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 9:07 PM >>Subject: Re: consolidate code >> >> >>From: Eluze >>Subject: Re: consolidate code >>Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:57:54 -0800 (PST) >> >> >>M

Re: consolidate code

2014-02-11 Thread David Nalesnik
Hi, On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Phil Holmes wrote: > OK - so this "tiny" example is 107 lines of code. > > > > - Original Message - > *From:* MING TSANG > *To:* -Eluze ; lilypond-user > mailinglist > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 11, 2014 9:07

Re: consolidate code

2014-02-11 Thread Phil Holmes
Tuesday, February 11, 2014 9:07 PM Subject: Re: consolidate code From: Eluze Subject: Re: consolidate code Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:57:54 -0800 (PST) -- MING TSANG wrote > I hope the attac

Re: consolidate code

2014-02-11 Thread MING TSANG
From: Eluze Subject: Re: consolidate code Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:57:54 -0800 (PST) MING TSANG wrote >I hope the attached .ly file qualifies as tiny snippet. >>certainly not - >please reduce it to one or two notes to show the >>unexpect

Re: consolidate code

2014-02-11 Thread Eluze
> under what the code is doing except they display numbers or solfege.  you could at least specify where the code you use is coming from! thanks! Eluze -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/consolidate-code-tp159125p159126.html Sent from the User mail