Re: complex time signatures: scheme help

2009-08-14 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 8/14/09 5:57 PM, "Reinhold Kainhofer" wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Am Samstag, 15. August 2009 01:06:40 schrieb Carl Sorensen: >> On 8/14/09 4:46 PM, "Reinhold Kainhofer" wrote: >>> Attached is my current code for general complex time signatures >>> (arbitr

Re: complex time signatures: scheme help

2009-08-14 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Samstag, 15. August 2009 01:06:40 schrieb Carl Sorensen: > On 8/14/09 4:46 PM, "Reinhold Kainhofer" wrote: > > Attached is my current code for general complex time signatures > > (arbitrary # of fractions, arbitrary # of numerators). I have not yet

Re: complex time signatures: scheme help

2009-08-14 Thread Graham Percival
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:13:18PM +0200, James E. Bailey wrote: > Look at that, even I need scheme. I wanted to have the time signature be > > 3+3+2 > 8 Great! Search the archives for this list, last Oct or Nov or maybe even Dec, to find the solution. "lilypond elegance" will help the sea

Re: complex time signatures: scheme help

2009-08-14 Thread James E. Bailey
On 15.08.2009, at 00:46, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Freitag, 14. August 2009 23:13:18 schrieb James E. Bailey: Look at that, even I need scheme. I wanted to have the time signature be 3+3+2 8 Apparently this is where Scheme is necessar

Re: complex time signatures: scheme help

2009-08-14 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 8/14/09 4:46 PM, "Reinhold Kainhofer" wrote: > Attached is my current code for general complex time signatures (arbitrary # > of fractions, arbitrary # of numerators). I have not yet tried to get it into > master, because the auto-beaming does not yet follow the signature. How should aut

Re: complex time signatures: scheme help

2009-08-14 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Freitag, 14. August 2009 23:13:18 schrieb James E. Bailey: > Look at that, even I need scheme. I wanted to have the time signature be > > 3+3+2 > 8 > > Apparently this is where Scheme is necessary. I've found the one that > makes it > 3+3+2 >

Re: complex time signatures: scheme help

2009-08-14 Thread Mark Polesky
James E. Bailey wrote: > > 3) decide if you want > >(#:column (one num)) > >...or just... > >one > >etc. > This bit I don't understand. (#:column (one num)) would be the > equivalent of \markup \center-column { one num }, right? > How would I do > \markup \center-column {\line {one

Re: complex time signatures: scheme help

2009-08-14 Thread James E. Bailey
On 15.08.2009, at 00:30, Carl Sorensen wrote: 3) decide if you want (#:column (one num)) ...or just... one etc. This bit I don't understand. (#:column (one num)) would be the equivalent of \markup \center-column { one num }, right? How would I do \markup \center-column {\line {on

Re: complex time signatures: scheme help

2009-08-14 Thread Mark Polesky
James E. Bailey wrote: > > 3) decide if you want > >(#:column (one num)) > >...or just... > >one > >etc. > This bit I don't understand. (#:column (one num)) would be the > equivalent of \markup \center-column { one num }, right? > How would I do > \markup \center-column {\line {one

Re: complex time signatures: scheme help

2009-08-14 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 8/14/09 4:12 PM, "James E. Bailey" wrote: > > On 14.08.2009, at 23:59, Mark Polesky wrote: >> >> Umm, that's probably not the best way of asking for help... We >> usually prefer "can someone point me in the right direction" or >> something like that... > > Usually I do, except here, a po

Re: complex time signatures: scheme help

2009-08-14 Thread James E. Bailey
On 14.08.2009, at 23:59, Mark Polesky wrote: Umm, that's probably not the best way of asking for help... We usually prefer "can someone point me in the right direction" or something like that... Usually I do, except here, a point in the right direction wouldn't be sufficient for me. I kinda

Re: complex time signatures: scheme help

2009-08-14 Thread Mark Polesky
James E. Bailey wrote: > Apparently this is where Scheme is necessary. I've found the one > that makes it > 3+3+2 > 8 8 8 > > in the documentation but I don't understand how to make the change. > > Can someone just do that for me? Umm, that's probably not the best way of asking for help... We usua

complex time signatures: scheme help

2009-08-14 Thread James E. Bailey
Look at that, even I need scheme. I wanted to have the time signature be 3+3+2 8 Apparently this is where Scheme is necessary. I've found the one that makes it 3+3+2 8 8 8 in the documentation but I don't understand how to make the change. #(define ((compound-time one two num) grob)